Skype trouble: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "An internationally recognised defence to conference call ambush. It is a common-enough scenario: some consultant has been warbling on about cost cutting metrics for 45..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{anat|confcall}} | |||
An internationally recognised defence to [[conference call ambush]]. It is a common-enough scenario: some [[consultant]] has been warbling on about cost cutting metrics for 45 minutes, you’ve drifted off completely and are searching Amazon for electric shaver lubricant<ref>Real life example, needless to say.</ref> and the question presently occupying your mind is “can I use sewing machine oil because that is like waaaay cheaper” when the consultant rounds on you with a specific, direct and (for all you know) perfectly sensible question that only you can argue. You have to buy time; “[[sorry, I was on mute]]” only delays the inevitable because while it excuses your silence it will not excuse your lack of attention to the call. | An internationally recognised defence to [[conference call ambush]]. It is a common-enough scenario: some [[consultant]] has been warbling on about cost cutting metrics for 45 minutes, you’ve drifted off completely and are searching Amazon for electric shaver lubricant<ref>Real life example, needless to say.</ref> and the question presently occupying your mind is “can I use sewing machine oil because that is like waaaay cheaper” when the consultant rounds on you with a specific, direct and (for all you know) perfectly sensible question that only you can argue. You have to buy time; “[[sorry, I was on mute]]” only delays the inevitable because while it excuses your silence it will not excuse your lack of attention to the call. | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 30 October 2018
|
Conference Call Anatomy™
{{{2}}}
|
An internationally recognised defence to conference call ambush. It is a common-enough scenario: some consultant has been warbling on about cost cutting metrics for 45 minutes, you’ve drifted off completely and are searching Amazon for electric shaver lubricant[1] and the question presently occupying your mind is “can I use sewing machine oil because that is like waaaay cheaper” when the consultant rounds on you with a specific, direct and (for all you know) perfectly sensible question that only you can argue. You have to buy time; “sorry, I was on mute” only delays the inevitable because while it excuses your silence it will not excuse your lack of attention to the call.
The answer is Skype trouble.
Sorry, I was having Skype trouble and my audio was breaking up for a bit. Can you say that again?
See also
- ↑ Real life example, needless to say.