Sorry, I was on mute: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{anat|confcall}}
{{anat|confcall}}
A partial defence to [[conference call ambush]], but one does not excuse you from not having heard (read ''paid any attention to'') the dreary monologue that has gone on for the previous ten minutes, the conclusion to which is an open-ended question to you. “Sorry, I was on mute” buys you time, but time won’t help you if you don’t have the foggiest idea what was being said in the first place.
A partial defence to [[conference call ambush]], but one does not excuse you from not having heard (read ''paid any attention to'') the dreary monologue that has gone on for the previous ten minutes, the conclusion to which is an open-ended question to you. “[[Sorry, I was on mute]]” buys you time, but time won’t help you if you don’t have the foggiest idea what was being said in the first place.


A better tactic is “sorry, [[Skype trouble]].”
A better tactic is “sorry, [[Skype trouble]].” For the genuinely belligerent, you could try going [[crazy Ivan]] at the bottom of the hour.


{{Seealso}}
{{Seealso}}

Revision as of 13:27, 13 November 2018

Conference Call Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


A partial defence to conference call ambush, but one does not excuse you from not having heard (read paid any attention to) the dreary monologue that has gone on for the previous ten minutes, the conclusion to which is an open-ended question to you. “Sorry, I was on mute” buys you time, but time won’t help you if you don’t have the foggiest idea what was being said in the first place.

A better tactic is “sorry, Skype trouble.” For the genuinely belligerent, you could try going crazy Ivan at the bottom of the hour.

See also