Operationalisation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{A|Technology|}}The [[management consultancy]] dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now. | {{A|Technology|}}The [[management consultancy]] dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now. | ||
The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are not going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time. | The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are ''not'' going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, in the mean time large organisations are run by people like John Cryan<ref>Though not ''actually'' John Cryan, of course, any more.</ref>, and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time. | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} |
Revision as of 17:37, 20 March 2019
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
The management consultancy dogma which sees and lovingly embraces a dystopian future in which the machines take over, and is hell bent on getting them to take over now.
The good news, long term, is that the idea is profoundly flawed and that machines are not going to take over. The bad news, short term, is that this will not become apparent for a long time yet, in the mean time large organisations are run by people like John Cryan[1], and many good people will be disenfranchised and driven up the wall in the mean time.
See also
- ↑ Though not actually John Cryan, of course, any more.