Template:Deemed repetition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And what of this idea that one not only [[Representations and warranties|represents and warrants]] as of the moment one inks the paper, but also is [[deemed]] to ''repeat'' itself an the execution of each trade, on any day, or whenever a butterfly flaps its wings on [[Fitzcarraldo|Fitzcarraldo’s steamer]]<ref>Or whatever. WHATEVER DUDE.</ref>? Do we think it works? Do we? Given how | And what of this idea that one not only [[Representations and warranties|represents and warrants]] as of the moment one inks the paper, but also is [[deemed]] to ''repeat'' itself an the execution of each trade, on any day, or whenever a butterfly flaps its wings on [[Fitzcarraldo|Fitzcarraldo’s steamer]]<ref>Or whatever. WHATEVER DUDE.</ref>? Do we think it works? Do we? Given how<ref>WARNING: [[JC|CONTRARIAN]] VIEW COMING UP.</ref> practically '''useless''' even ''explicit'' [[representations]] are, ''does it really matter''? | ||
And, having given one, how are you supposed to ''stop'' a continuing {{tag|representation}} once it has marched off into the unknowable future, like one of those conjured brooms from the Sorcerer’s Apprentice? If you don’t stop it, what then? | |||
Revision as of 15:08, 10 May 2019
And what of this idea that one not only represents and warrants as of the moment one inks the paper, but also is deemed to repeat itself an the execution of each trade, on any day, or whenever a butterfly flaps its wings on Fitzcarraldo’s steamer[1]? Do we think it works? Do we? Given how[2] practically useless even explicit representations are, does it really matter?
And, having given one, how are you supposed to stop a continuing representation once it has marched off into the unknowable future, like one of those conjured brooms from the Sorcerer’s Apprentice? If you don’t stop it, what then?
- ↑ Or whatever. WHATEVER DUDE.
- ↑ WARNING: CONTRARIAN VIEW COMING UP.