Yngwie Malmsteen paradox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{A|glossary| | {{A|glossary| | ||
[[File:Yngwie.jpg|thumb|center|[[Yngwie Malmsteen|Yngwie]] yesterday. Ok: yesteryear, at any rate.]] | [[File:Yngwie.jpg|thumb|center|[[Yngwie Malmsteen|Yngwie]] yesterday. Ok: yesteryear, at any rate.]] | ||
}}{{pe}}Also known as the [[Jazz paradox]], the [[Yngwie Malmsteen paradox]] addresses the power of technology make our lives easier, by making them harder. | }}{{pe}}Also known as the [[Jazz paradox]], the [[Yngwie Malmsteen paradox]] addresses this irony: the power of technology to make our lives easier, by making them ''harder''. | ||
{{Yngwie malmsteen paradox capsule}} | {{Yngwie malmsteen paradox capsule}} | ||
Revision as of 09:29, 26 June 2019
|
|
Towards more picturesque speech™
|
Also known as the Jazz paradox, the Yngwie Malmsteen paradox addresses this irony: the power of technology to make our lives easier, by making them harder.
Modern information technology allows us to freely manipulate, desiccate, desecrate, defibrillate and duplicate data. A good enough algorithm can, in theory, handle any kind of syntactical complexity, costlessly ingesting and processing the densest textual construction. With a simple cut-and-paste we can replicate, vary and augment at will. But this generates what we call the “Yngwie Malmsteen paradox”[1]: Just because guitar technology[2] means you can play 64th note flattened mixolydian arpeggios at 200 bpm doesn’t mean you should.
See also
- Reg tech and why it is so disappointing — due in part, by analogy, to Yngwie Malmsteen.
References
- ↑ Spinal Tap’s Nigel Tufnel might have called it the “Jazz paradox”
- ↑ Scalloped frets, flat radii, locking tuners, rectified amplifiers etc.