Technology paradox: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{seealso}} | {{seealso}} | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox Jevons paradox] | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox Jevons paradox] | ||
*[[Reg tech]] | |||
*[[Substance and form]] | *[[Substance and form]] | ||
*[[Internal audit]] | *[[Internal audit]] | ||
{{c|paradox}} | {{c|paradox}} |
Revision as of 11:48, 5 July 2019
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
“What Andy giveth, Bill taketh away.”
The power your technology gives you to do things more quickly, the more crap, crud and bloatware - the more form your institutional bureaucrats will inject into your process to slow it down again. Yes, Legal, Compliance, Internal audit, Credit — I'm looking at you.
Closely related to the Jevons paradox, where increase in the efficiency of coal-fired steam engines led to an increase in the demand and therefore cost for coal, largely offsetting the improved efficiency of the machine. But for the technology paradox the irony is even crueller: at least with a coal-powered engine you get more speed and power, even if you have to pay for it. But with tech even though the machine is more powerful it can’t go faster — it is beaten down to the grinding pace, or worse by that almost costless bloatware.