Bearer security: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Title transfer by delivery makes bearer instruments hard to track and tax, meaning they are not popular with [[Internal Revenue Service|taxing authorities]] or [[money laundering reporting officer]]s.
Title transfer by delivery makes bearer instruments hard to track and tax, meaning they are not popular with [[Internal Revenue Service|taxing authorities]] or [[money laundering reporting officer]]s.


The rise of electronic transfer means that secureities are now in [[dematerialised]] form, and the scope for true anonymity of [[financial instruments]] is progressively limited, though this didn't stop those hearty [[DLT]] refuseniks having a good old bash with [[bitcoin]].
The rise of electronic transfer means that securities are now in [[dematerialised]] form, and the scope for true anonymity of [[financial instruments]] is progressively limited, though this didn't stop those hearty [[DLT]] refuseniks having a good old bash with [[bitcoin]].


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Dematerialised security]]
*[[Dematerialised securities]]
*[[Negotiable instrument]]
*[[Negotiable instrument]]
*[[Transferable security]]
*[[Transferable security]]
*[[Bitcoin]]
*[[Bitcoin]]

Revision as of 17:21, 17 July 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A financial instrument title to which passes by delivery, so that whoever holds the instrument from time to time owns it absolutely.

This means a person dealing with the “bearer” of a bearer security need not worry herself about its provenance, the 'bona fides' of the bearer or the plausibility of the bearer’s right to the asset.

You got it, you own it.

This makes bearer instruments great stores of liquid value (cash is the example par excellence of a bearer instrument, though it is not a “security” as such), but not so good for representing ownership of assets which imply obligations as well as entitlements, or where it is important to the issuer of the instrument who holds them from time to time, such as equity securities, which imply both. Equities are almost never issued in bearer form.

Title transfer by delivery makes bearer instruments hard to track and tax, meaning they are not popular with taxing authorities or money laundering reporting officers.

The rise of electronic transfer means that securities are now in dematerialised form, and the scope for true anonymity of financial instruments is progressively limited, though this didn't stop those hearty DLT refuseniks having a good old bash with bitcoin.

See also