Behavioural economics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Great dogmas=== | ===Great dogmas=== | ||
* | *Data will make us redundant | ||
:*Signal to noise ratio? | :*Signal to noise ratio? | ||
:*Derivatives | :*Derivatives | ||
*Integrity of process is paramount: If the process is perfect, there is no risk | |||
*Risk is bad | |||
:*Risk is ''inevitable'' | |||
:*Risk is a condition precedent to return. Understand and manage risks; don’t try to banish them. | |||
*[[This time it is different]] | *[[This time it is different]] | ||
*[[We have banished risk]] | *[[We have banished risk]] | ||
Revision as of 19:16, 5 August 2019
|
Landing page for BE ideas.
Lean manufacture
- Are there wastes in our process
- Seven wastes of negotiation
Great dogmas
- Data will make us redundant
- Signal to noise ratio?
- Derivatives
- Integrity of process is paramount: If the process is perfect, there is no risk
- Risk is bad
- Risk is inevitable
- Risk is a condition precedent to return. Understand and manage risks; don’t try to banish them.
Machines versus humans
- Have we got the division of labour right?
- Machine - Digital
- Replicable, cheap, free, value zero.
- Ultimate fidelity
- Fast
- Algorithmic: will work. Needs no supervision
- Rules
- Deterministic
- Literal
- Data-dependent
- Human
- Analog
- Error-prone
- Heuristic: might work: Needs supervision
- Slow
- Ambiguous
- Metaphorical
- Evaluation
- Triage versus redundancy
- You can strip a deterministic process out of a messy human one
- You can't force the genuinely intractable analog to the digital