Discourse on the Method: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Rene Descartes]]’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by [[Otto Büchstein]]<ref>[[Discourse on the Intercourse]].</ref>, who proved that there must be at least three people in the universe, and since they were all engaged on a [[conference call]], God was almost certainly not one of them.
[[Rene Descartes]]’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by [[Otto Büchstein]]<ref>[[Discourse on the Intercourse]].</ref>, who proved that there must be at least three people in the universe, and since they were all engaged on a [[conference call]], God was almost certainly not one of them.


“God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do [[conference calls]].What would be the point?”  
“God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do [[conference call]]s.What would be the point?”  


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Revision as of 14:31, 4 September 2019

Rene Descartes’ famous proof of the existence of God, inferred from the necessary existence of the self. Roundly debunked by Otto Büchstein[1], who proved that there must be at least three people in the universe, and since they were all engaged on a conference call, God was almost certainly not one of them.

“God is omniscient,” he said. “God doesn’t do conference calls.What would be the point?”

See also

Metaphysics