Cash flow: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{g}}Two distinct meanings in the financial markets, though they're related. *'''Asset cashflows''': When talking about a financial instrument, its cashflows — usua..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}Two distinct meanings in the financial markets, though they're related. | {{g}}Two distinct meanings in the financial markets, though they're related. | ||
*'''Asset cashflows''': When talking about a [[financial instrument]], its [[cashflows]] — usually plural — are the payment streams owed on that instrument: [[Principal]], [[interest]], [[dividend]]s, [[distribution]]s and so on. Of course, these payments come due over time and may be dependent on external factors<ref>For example: A floating rate obligation will depend on the published [[interest rate]] determined for each interest period; a fixed rate obligation is set at the beginning, and once set, doesn't depend on anything | *'''Asset cashflows''': When talking about a [[financial instrument]], its [[cashflows]] — usually plural — are the payment streams owed on that instrument: [[Principal]], [[interest]], [[dividend]]s, [[distribution]]s and so on. Of course, these payments come due over time and may be dependent on external factors<ref>For example: A floating rate obligation will depend on the published [[interest rate]] determined for each interest period; a fixed rate obligation is set at the beginning, and once set, doesn't depend on anything.</ref> | ||
*'''Company cash flow''': When talking about a business, its “[[cash flow]]” — a singular, abstract noun — is the sum total of all its incomings, outgoings and bank balances. A company that is “[[cashflow positive]]”, over a given period, it takes in more money than it pays out. A company that is “[[cashflow negative]]” (also called, if big enough and filled with enough hot air, a “[[unicorn]]”) pays out more money in a given period than it takes in. If its financiers and stockholders are patient enough, — as Uber’s seem to be, for example — a company can stay [[cashflow negative]] longer than its [[short-seller]]s can stay solvent. But being cashflow negative means having cash in the bank to meet the monthly shortfall. If you have to borrow cash to meet the shortfall, your monthly shortfall is sure to get bigger each month. If you don’t, you soon will have to, if you don’t sort it out. A company which is cashflow negative and doesn't have (and can’t raise) money to cover the shortfall., is “[[Cashflow insolvency|cashflow insolvent]]”. Not good. A company whose assets are worth more than its liabilities can nonetheless be [[cashflow insolvent]]. [[Lehman Brothers]], for example. | *'''Company cash flow''': When talking about a business, its “[[cash flow]]” — a singular, abstract noun — is the sum total of all its incomings, outgoings and bank balances. A company that is “[[cashflow positive]]”, over a given period, it takes in more money than it pays out. A company that is “[[cashflow negative]]” (also called, if big enough and filled with enough hot air, a “[[unicorn]]”) pays out more money in a given period than it takes in. If its financiers and stockholders are patient enough, — as Uber’s seem to be, for example — a company can stay [[cashflow negative]] longer than its [[short-seller]]s can stay solvent. But being cashflow negative means having cash in the bank to meet the monthly shortfall. If you have to borrow cash to meet the shortfall, your monthly shortfall is sure to get bigger each month. If you don’t, you soon will have to, if you don’t sort it out. A company which is cashflow negative and doesn't have (and can’t raise) money to cover the shortfall., is “[[Cashflow insolvency|cashflow insolvent]]”. Not good. A company whose assets are worth more than its liabilities can nonetheless be [[cashflow insolvent]]. [[Lehman Brothers]], for example. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Financial instrument]] | |||
*[[Cashflow insolvency]] |
Revision as of 15:36, 20 October 2019
|
Two distinct meanings in the financial markets, though they're related.
- Asset cashflows: When talking about a financial instrument, its cashflows — usually plural — are the payment streams owed on that instrument: Principal, interest, dividends, distributions and so on. Of course, these payments come due over time and may be dependent on external factors[1]
- Company cash flow: When talking about a business, its “cash flow” — a singular, abstract noun — is the sum total of all its incomings, outgoings and bank balances. A company that is “cashflow positive”, over a given period, it takes in more money than it pays out. A company that is “cashflow negative” (also called, if big enough and filled with enough hot air, a “unicorn”) pays out more money in a given period than it takes in. If its financiers and stockholders are patient enough, — as Uber’s seem to be, for example — a company can stay cashflow negative longer than its short-sellers can stay solvent. But being cashflow negative means having cash in the bank to meet the monthly shortfall. If you have to borrow cash to meet the shortfall, your monthly shortfall is sure to get bigger each month. If you don’t, you soon will have to, if you don’t sort it out. A company which is cashflow negative and doesn't have (and can’t raise) money to cover the shortfall., is “cashflow insolvent”. Not good. A company whose assets are worth more than its liabilities can nonetheless be cashflow insolvent. Lehman Brothers, for example.
See also
- ↑ For example: A floating rate obligation will depend on the published interest rate determined for each interest period; a fixed rate obligation is set at the beginning, and once set, doesn't depend on anything.