Tedium: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===The [[third law of worker entropy]]=== | ===The [[third law of worker entropy]]=== | ||
{{third law of worker entropy}} | |||
If an activity is 25% tedious it is 25% wasteful. | If an activity is 25% tedious it is 25% wasteful. | ||
Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*The [[JC]]’s [[ | *The [[JC]]’s [[laws of worker entropy]] | ||
*The [[seven wastes of negotiation]] | *The [[seven wastes of negotiation]] | ||
{{c|entropy}} | {{c|entropy}} | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 15:35, 28 October 2019
|
Describes any activity which, when you stand back and look at it, serves no real purpose, however formally emollient it may feel.
If, as a young clerk, re-dating a stack of trust deeds at 3 in the morning after a bished execution[1], you have ever regarded the clock, shaken your head and asked yourself “is there really no better way to do this?” then you have looked into the tedial abyss. Careful, lest it looks back into you.
A short, tedious history.
Merriam Webster is amusing on the etymology:
- Words frequently change their meanings, and some even will go from meaning one thing to meaning something almost opposite (such as “nice”, which in its earliest use meant “lewd, wanton, dissolute”). Tedious is not one of these words; its meanings may have shifted over the centuries, but they have always had something to do with irksome, boring, or overlong things. The word comes from the Latin taedēre, meaning “to disgust or weary.” Tedious has been in use since the 15th century and has been included in hundreds of dictionaries, although perhaps none have rendered so poetic and succinct a definition as Nathaniel Bailey’s entry in his 1756 New Universal Etymological English Dictionary: “Wearisome by continuance.”
The third law of worker entropy
The JC’s third law of worker entropy, also known as “the law of inevitable tedium”: There is a 100% correlation between
- (i) activities that, however important they might seem, in fact have no value, and
- (ii) activities that are tedious.
All other things being equal, if an activity is tedious, it is wasteful. If it is wasteful, you shouldn’t do it.
If an activity is 25% tedious it is 25% wasteful.
Tedium and interest
I can’t prove this, but tedium is not the opposite of “interesting”. There is an intermediate purgatorial state which is not particularly interesting in any meaningful sense of the word, but is not especially tedious either. Bruce Springsteen’s album Nebraska, for example.
See also
References
- ↑ You may think this may have the searing scar of verisimilitude about it.