Limitation Act 1980: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Defamation and malicious falsehood''': no such action shall be brought after the expiration of '''one year''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued. | *'''Defamation and malicious falsehood''': no such action shall be brought after the expiration of '''one year''' from the date on which the cause of action accrued. | ||
See the act for more tedious detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death. | See the [http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 text in the act itself] for more [[tedious]] detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death. | ||
===Simple contracts=== | Of course, what we finance types care about are claims under ''{{t|contract}}s''. About those, and that curious expression “[[simple contract]]s” | ||
===“[[Simple contracts]]”=== | |||
{{simplecontract}} | {{simplecontract}} | ||
This was designed to ameliorate the [[common law]] position<ref>{{cite1|Re Brown’s Estate|1893 | This was designed to ameliorate the [[common law]] position<ref>{{cite1|Re Brown’s Estate|1893|2Ch|300}}</ref>, that a loan repayable on demand or without a specific repayment date is treated as being repayable immediately, and the [[limitation period]] runs from the day it is advanced. This is an utterly bonkers decision, by the way. It means if you ask for repayment on the day before the limitation period kicks in you must immediately launch court proceedings to recover it. | ||
Anyway, all fixed now: If you don’t have an obligation to repay the money at a particular time, absent a demand, the [[limitation period]] only starts to run from the date of demand. | Anyway, all fixed now: If you don’t have an obligation to repay the money at a particular time, absent a demand, the [[limitation period]] only starts to run from the date of demand. | ||
===Reform=== | ===Reform=== | ||
Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The [[Limitation Act 1980]] was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015 | Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The [[Limitation Act 1980]] was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015<ref>[http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/03/lc270_Limitation_of_Actions.pdf knock yourself out].</ref> so clearly ''someone'' sees the opportunity to change the law. But at least it is better than it was after {{cite1|Re Brown’s Estate|1893|2Ch|300}}. | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 Text of the Limitation Act] | *[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58 Text of the Limitation Act] | ||
*[http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/03/lc270_Limitation_of_Actions.pdf Law Commission bunker-buster from 2015] | |||
*[[Statue of limitations]] | *[[Statue of limitations]] | ||
{{c2|Contract|UK Legislation}} | {{c2|Contract|UK Legislation}} | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 7 November 2019
|
Not to be confused with that monstrous eulogy to Schadenfreude, the statue of limitations.
The Limitation Act 1980, known fondly as the statute of limitations, is a piece of UK legislation dealing with limitations on legal claims under contracts, tort and so on.
- Tort: An action founded on tort shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued: Section 2.
- Contract: Claims on a simple contract are limited to six years from the date the cause of action accrued: Section 5.
- Defamation and malicious falsehood: no such action shall be brought after the expiration of one year from the date on which the cause of action accrued.
See the text in the act itself for more tedious detail about what happens in the case of personal injury or death.
Of course, what we finance types care about are claims under contracts. About those, and that curious expression “simple contracts”
“Simple contracts”
Under the Limitation Act 1980 a “Simple contract” is one that is neither a “specialty”[1] nor an insurance contract[2] nor a “contract of loan” which has no fixed repayment date, where repayment is not conditional on a demand, [warning:strap yourselves in for this next bit]
“except where, in connection with taking the loan, the debtor enters into any collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it (as, for example, by delivering a promissory note as security for the debt) on terms which would exclude the application of this section to the contract of loan if they applied directly to repayment of the debt.”
We quote that last bit in full because, for a short extract, it is bloody hard to decipher. There are no explanatory notes to the Limitation Act 1980, but for help we have that Law Commission bunker buster which says:
“Section 6 does not apply where the debtor enters into a collateral obligation to pay the amount of the debt or any part of it on a fixed or determinable date or conditional on a demand for repayment (or other condition).”
So if the promissory note itself is a demand loan, but it is pledged as collateral for another debt which isn’t, then it counts as having a payment date. That’s the best I can do.
Note: “repayment on a stated maturity date, conditional upon demand by the creditor”, sounds a lot like the process for redeeming a bond — at least when held in physical, definitive form. Thus, definitive debt securities are not simple contracts.
Whether this is true of electronically cleared debt securities — that is, ahhh — all of them, these days — is a an interesting question, as these are paid out automatically to account holders in clearing systems.
This was designed to ameliorate the common law position[3], that a loan repayable on demand or without a specific repayment date is treated as being repayable immediately, and the limitation period runs from the day it is advanced. This is an utterly bonkers decision, by the way. It means if you ask for repayment on the day before the limitation period kicks in you must immediately launch court proceedings to recover it.
Anyway, all fixed now: If you don’t have an obligation to repay the money at a particular time, absent a demand, the limitation period only starts to run from the date of demand.
Reform
Lots of good fun, particularly in the area of latent defects in the construction of houses, for forensic examination of precisely when a cause of action accrues, of course. The Limitation Act 1980 was the subject of a 320 page law commission monograph in 2015[4] so clearly someone sees the opportunity to change the law. But at least it is better than it was after Re Brown’s Estate [1893] 2Ch 300[5].
See also
References
- ↑ A written document like a security deed that has been sealed, delivered and given as security for the payment of a specific debt.
- ↑ Perhaps not “simple” because of the implied duty of utmost good faith — who knows?
- ↑ Re Brown’s Estate [1893] 2Ch 300[1]
- ↑ knock yourself out.
- ↑ Let me Google that for you