Panel discussion: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Do as I say, folks=== | ===Do as I say, folks=== | ||
The [[JC]] was meant to appear in a [[panel discussion]] recently on the topic “[[compliance]] challenges of [[reg tech]]” — a topic<ref>I know what you are thinking: that is like ''most'' topics.</ref> | The [[JC]] was meant to appear in a [[panel discussion]] recently on the topic “[[compliance]] challenges of [[reg tech]]” — a topic about which he knows, and cares, very little.<ref>I know what you are thinking: that is like ''most'' topics.</ref> As it happens, he clean forgot to go – neatly illustrating the “compliance challenges of [[meatware]]”, a subject about with which he is a lot more expert. | ||
===The panel selfie=== | ===The panel selfie=== | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 15 November 2019
|
Along with computer-based training and continuing professional development, the panel discussion — jammed between workshops at an all-day conference as cheap filler, like one of those dreary Inside Africa fillers that run on a loop on CNN international and is watched only by business travelers captive of the Airport Hilton in Bucharest — is one of the great blights of a modern corporate life quite overwhelmed with them. This is not to say the keynote sessions running either side are a whole lot better, but the idea of hearing an assemblage of aspiring junior partners, industry association inhouse counsel and random change management consultants mumble disinterestedly about the impact on market stability of transa —
Sorry where was I?
In any case case in as we move into this glorious millennium's second decade a whole new genre of career has hoved into view through the oily midwifery of LinkedIn: the panel discusser. There are people who who, by all appearances, spend the majority of their working lives attending, or speaking on, panel discussions. No topic is too arcane, no facet of the regulatory landscape too dreary, no selfie with fellow-panel members too prostrating of one’s self-esteem, to be beyond the siren call of temptation to these men and women.
Now, if you're a junior partner in an offshore law firm you might rationalise this as a quick way of burnishing credentials and building a profile amongst that electric community of corporate agency and trust services professionals.
But for the middling executive director in an in-house legal function — let alone part of the Legal COO team — it's harder to understand who let them out and why.
Do as I say, folks
The JC was meant to appear in a panel discussion recently on the topic “compliance challenges of reg tech” — a topic about which he knows, and cares, very little.[1] As it happens, he clean forgot to go – neatly illustrating the “compliance challenges of meatware”, a subject about with which he is a lot more expert.
The panel selfie
Just what possesses people to post images to LinkedIn of themselves sitting awkwardly on a low stage in front of thirty bored associate directors, with “great panel discussion today about the EMIR refit!”
What do they have in mind? Do they imagine their network to be flooded with envy, or jealousy, or remorse at the sparkling debate it now discovers it has missed?
See also
- LinkedIn influencer’s advice on how to hold a great panel discussion I mean shoot me.
- More LinkedIn Influencer advice on how to hold a great panel discussion
- Yet more LinkedIn Influencer advice on how to hold a great panel discussion
- You’re not going to believe this, but here is some more LinkedIn Influencer advice on how to hold a great panel discussion
- Continuing professional development
- Computer based training
References
- ↑ I know what you are thinking: that is like most topics.