Hotel California: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no no-fault termination right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your expos..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no [[no-fault termination]] right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself.
{{g}}A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no [[no-fault termination]] right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself.
 
{{sa}}
*[[Undead ISDA]]
*{{isdaprov|Early Termination}} under the {{isdama}}
{{egg}}
{{egg}}

Revision as of 14:33, 28 November 2019

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an ISDA Master Agreement, because there is no no-fault termination right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an Event of Default or Termination Event — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself.

See also