Hotel California: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no no-fault termination right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your expos..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no [[no-fault termination]] right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself. | {{g}}A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an {{isdama}}, because there is no [[no-fault termination]] right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}} or {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself. | ||
{{sa}} | |||
*[[Undead ISDA]] | |||
*{{isdaprov|Early Termination}} under the {{isdama}} | |||
{{egg}} | {{egg}} |
Revision as of 14:33, 28 November 2019
|
A similar state to the one you get in when you sign an ISDA Master Agreement, because there is no no-fault termination right under it. So you can check out (not trade, let your exposures roll off) but you can never leave (unless your counterparty commits an Event of Default or Termination Event — and even then you are terminating all transactions and not the agreement itself.