Exchanges - VM CSA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{csaanat|3(c)|2016}}Note here the {{vmcsaprov|Transferor}} can ask for an exchange, but the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}} is not obliged to accept it. This is a fundamental provision of “title transfer”: once the {{vmcsaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} is delivered under a {{1995csa}}, the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}} owns it absolutely. It only has to return {{vmcsaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}}. This is a special, [[ISDA ninja|legal ninja]]<ref>Oh, all right, and [[GMSLA ninja]], [[Repo ninja]] and other kinds of [[ninja]]s too.<ref> use of the word “[[equivalent]]”. It means “[[fungible]]”; ''exactly the same as ~''; not “broadly similar to ~”. | {{csaanat|3(c)|2016}}Note here the {{vmcsaprov|Transferor}} can ask for an exchange, but the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}} is not obliged to accept it. This is a fundamental provision of “title transfer”: once the {{vmcsaprov|Eligible Credit Support}} is delivered under a {{1995csa}}, the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}} owns it absolutely. It only has to return {{vmcsaprov|Equivalent Credit Support}}. This is a special, [[ISDA ninja|legal ninja]]<ref>Oh, all right, and [[GMSLA ninja]], [[Repo ninja]] and other kinds of [[ninja]]s too.</ref> use of the word “[[equivalent]]”. It means “[[fungible]]”; ''exactly the same as ~''; not “broadly similar to ~”. | ||
This is important also from a pricing (and operational) perspective: otherwise the {{vmcsaprov|Transferor}} would have a “worst-of” [[option]] and would be entitled to continually switch into the "cheapest to deliver" of the {{vmcsaprov|Eligible Credit Support}}. Needless to say, the increased collateral flows would also increase the operational burden. | This is important also from a pricing (and operational) perspective: otherwise the {{vmcsaprov|Transferor}} would have a “worst-of” [[option]] and would be entitled to continually switch into the "cheapest to deliver" of the {{vmcsaprov|Eligible Credit Support}}. Needless to say, the increased collateral flows would also increase the operational burden. |
Revision as of 17:20, 16 December 2019
2016 VM CSA Anatomy™
view template
view template
|
Note here the Transferor can ask for an exchange, but the Transferee is not obliged to accept it. This is a fundamental provision of “title transfer”: once the Eligible Credit Support is delivered under a 1995 CSA, the Transferee owns it absolutely. It only has to return Equivalent Credit Support. This is a special, legal ninja[1] use of the word “equivalent”. It means “fungible”; exactly the same as ~; not “broadly similar to ~”.
This is important also from a pricing (and operational) perspective: otherwise the Transferor would have a “worst-of” option and would be entitled to continually switch into the "cheapest to deliver" of the Eligible Credit Support. Needless to say, the increased collateral flows would also increase the operational burden.
Delivery Amounts: Contrast this with Delivery Amounts, where a Transferor has the option to deliver the cheapest of the Eligible Credit Support specified in the 1995 CSA.
Return Amounts: A Transferee does have a (limited) option in terms of selecting the Return Amount should there be a requirement to return posted credit support: it can select the cheapest to deliver of all the Eligible Credit Support that has been posted to it which currently comprises its Credit Support Balance.
- ↑ Oh, all right, and GMSLA ninja, Repo ninja and other kinds of ninjas too.