Ratings notches: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
And as in the early part of the millennium, we saw regulatory capital ratios predicated on ratings, meaning anyone who could hoodwink gullible [[rating agency]] professionals with a sophisticated cashflow model could create financial instruments with the potential to detonate the financial markets as we know them. [[CDO|Just as well that never happened]].
And as in the early part of the millennium, we saw regulatory capital ratios predicated on ratings, meaning anyone who could hoodwink gullible [[rating agency]] professionals with a sophisticated cashflow model could create financial instruments with the potential to detonate the financial markets as we know them. [[CDO|Just as well that never happened]].


Anyway, here, withe feeling, are the ratings notches.
{{sa}}
*[[Beware of shorthand]] but [[it’s okay to generalise]]
 
Anyway, here, with feeling, are the ratings notches.
===S&P===
===S&P===



Revision as of 00:06, 5 January 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Grades assigned to financial instruments and issuers by rating agencies to save the honest toilers in the asset management industry the bother of conducting fundamental financial analysis on said issuers and instruments before piling into their securities on behalf of his client roster of pensioners orphans, the morally weak and other similar mutual fund investors. Now a cynic (who? Moi?) might wonder just what such an honest toiler would be bringing to the investment decision if all he was doing was relying on a published rating — isn’t that a bit like judging a film on its a star rating from the film critic in the Daily Express? — but nor is expecting every asset manager in the land to conduct the same fundamental analysis on the same issuers and instruments a fabulously efficient use of resources either.

Nevertheless a good example of the perils of a second order derivative measure of quality: at least if you expect your asset manager to be able to conduct fundamental financial analysis, she might be able to pick up something that the rating agencies had missed. Relying entirely upon them opens up the market to any bullshit artist who knows his ABCs — all right, and his Aa1-Aa2-Aa3s — to make quick coin in a sucker's market.

And as in the early part of the millennium, we saw regulatory capital ratios predicated on ratings, meaning anyone who could hoodwink gullible rating agency professionals with a sophisticated cashflow model could create financial instruments with the potential to detonate the financial markets as we know them. Just as well that never happened.

See also

Anyway, here, with feeling, are the ratings notches.

S&P

Investment Grade

  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'BBB' has adequate capacity to meet its financial commitments. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitments. Equivalent to Moody's Template:Moodys
  • Template:S&P: Equivalent to Moody's Template:Moodys

Non-Investment Grade (also known as junk bonds)

  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'BB' is less vulnerable in the near term than other lower-rated obligors. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties and exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, which could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.
  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'B' is more vulnerable than the obligors rated 'BB', but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor's capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments.
  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'CCC' is currently vulnerable, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet its financial commitments.
  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'CC' is currently highly vulnerable.
  • Template:S&P: highly vulnerable, perhaps in bankruptcy or in arrears but still continuing to pay out on obligations
  • Template:S&P: past due on interest
  • Template:S&P: An obligor rated 'R' is under regulatory supervision owing to its financial condition. During the pendency of the regulatory supervision, the regulators may have the power to favor one class of obligations over others or pay some obligations and not others.
  • Template:S&P: has selectively defaulted on some obligations
  • Template:S&P: has defaulted on obligations and S&P believes that it will generally default on most or all obligations
  • Template:S&P: not rated

Moody's

Moody's credit ratings
Investment grade
Rating Long-term ratings Short-term ratings
Template:Moodys Rated as the highest quality and lowest credit risk. Prime-1
Best ability to repay short-term debt
Template:Moodys Rated as high quality and very low credit risk.
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys Rated as upper-medium grade and low credit risk.
Template:Moodys Prime-1/Prime-2
Best ability or high ability to repay short term debt
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys Rated as medium grade, with some speculative elements and moderate credit risk. Prime-2
High ability to repay short term debt
Template:Moodys Prime-2/Prime-3
High ability or acceptable ability to repay short term debt
Template:Moodys Prime-3
Acceptable ability to repay short term debt
Speculative grade
Rating Long-term ratings Short-term ratings
{{moodys|a1 Judged to have speculative elements and a significant credit risk. Not Prime
Do not fall within any of the prime categories
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys Judged as being speculative and a high credit risk.
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys Rated as poor quality and very high credit risk.
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys
Template:Moodys Judged to be highly speculative and with likelihood of being near or in default, but some possibility of recovering principal and interest.
Template:Moodys Rated as the lowest quality, usually in default and low likelihood of recovering principal or interest.