Skype trouble: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Sorry, I was having [[Skype trouble]] and my audio was breaking up for a bit. Can you say that again?
Sorry, I was having [[Skype trouble]] and my audio was breaking up for a bit. Can you say that again?


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Crazy Ivan]]
*[[Crazy Ivan]]
*[[sorry I was on mute]]
*[[sorry I was on mute]]
*[[Let's take it offline]]
*[[Let's take it offline]]
*[[Conference call]]
*[[Conference call]]

Revision as of 11:36, 18 January 2020

Conference Call Anatomy™
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


An internationally recognised defence to conference call ambush. It is a common-enough scenario: some consultant has been warbling on about cost cutting metrics for 45 minutes, you’ve drifted off completely and are searching Amazon for electric shaver lubricant[1] and the question presently occupying your mind is “can I use sewing machine oil because that is like waaaay cheaper” when the consultant rounds on you with a specific, direct and (for all you know) perfectly sensible question that only you can argue. You have to buy time; “sorry, I was on mute” only delays the inevitable because while it excuses your silence it will not excuse your lack of attention to the call.

The answer is Skype trouble.

Sorry, I was having Skype trouble and my audio was breaking up for a bit. Can you say that again?

See also

  1. Real life example, needless to say.