Fearns v Anglo-Dutch Paint and Chemical Company Ltd: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
What to do?
What to do?


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2366.html Judgment transcript from Fearns v Anglo-Dutch]
*[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/2366.html Judgment transcript from Fearns v Anglo-Dutch]
*[[Set-off]]
*[[Set-off]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 11:02, 19 January 2020

Regulatory Capital Anatomy™
The JC’s untutored thoughts on how bank capital works.


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Fearns and Anglo-Dutch sued each other. They both won. Fearns was awarded £438,569 for breach of trademark. Anglo Dutch was awarded €594,696 for goods sold to Mr Fearns which he didn't pay for.

Keen observers will note these amounts are in different currencies; one in the heroic currency of the United Kingdom, one in that ghastly monopoly money of those garlic-munching continentals.[1]

What to do?

See also

References

  1. ↑ We can say things like this now we have a Red white and blue Brexit, right?
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Fearns_v_Anglo-Dutch_Paint_and_Chemical_Company_Ltd&oldid=38494"