Template:Isda peod analysis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''{{{{{1}}}|DUST}}''' references notice requirements and [[grace period]]s under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}} (where there is has been a [[default]]) but not where it is a [[repudiation]], but that kind of figures. | *'''{{{{{1}}}|DUST}}''' references notice requirements and [[grace period]]s under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}} (where there is has been a [[default]]) but not where it is a [[repudiation]], but that kind of figures. | ||
*'''{{{{{1}}}|Cross Default}}''', that most absurd of all {{{{{1}}}|Events of Default}}, has no notice requirement, no [[grace period]], and doesn't even require the lender of the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} to have exercised a termination right — though any [[grace period]] under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} still applies. | *'''{{{{{1}}}|Cross Default}}''', that most absurd of all {{{{{1}}}|Events of Default}}, has no notice requirement, no [[grace period]], and doesn't even require the lender of the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} to have exercised a termination right — though any [[grace period]] under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} still applies. | ||
*{{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} has no notice requirement or [[grace period]] (indeed, on {{{{{1}}}|Automatic Termination Event}} applies it may happens even without the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}}’s knowledge), though there are some [[grace period]]s under the various [[tedious]] limbs of {{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} definition<ref>See for example Sections | *{{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} has no notice requirement or [[grace period]] (indeed, on {{{{{1}}}|Automatic Termination Event}} applies it may happens even without the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}}’s knowledge), though there are some [[grace period]]s under the various [[tedious]] limbs of {{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} definition<ref>See for example Sections 5(a)(viii)(4) and (7).</ref>, and these vary by edition of the {{isdama}}<ref>30 days in the {{1992ma}}, 15 days in the {{2002ma}}; | ||
*'''{{{{{1}}}|Merger Without Assumption}}''' has neither notice requirement or [[grace period]] — again not unreasonable since a merger without assumption is tantamount to a [[repudiation]] of [[contract]], and if you’re not playing the [[Hermeneutical boundaries|hermeneutic game]] no more, there is no reason ''I'' should. | *'''{{{{{1}}}|Merger Without Assumption}}''' has neither notice requirement or [[grace period]] — again not unreasonable since a merger without assumption is tantamount to a [[repudiation]] of [[contract]], and if you’re not playing the [[Hermeneutical boundaries|hermeneutic game]] no more, there is no reason ''I'' should. |
Revision as of 17:53, 13 March 2020
Grace periods and notice requirements for each {{{{{1}}}|Event of Default}}
A JC cut-out-and-keep™ guide. Useful if you are fretting about {{{{{1}}}|Potential Event of Default}}. Don’t feel embarrassed: we all do, every now and then, when spring is upon us.
- {{{{{1}}}|Failure to Pay or Deliver}} has both a short grace period and requires notice from the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} before it becomes a full EOD;
- {{{{{1}}}|Breach of Agreement}} has an unusably, epochally long grace period — I mean thirty fricking days! — and requires notice from the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}} before it becomes a full EOD;
- {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Default}} has no grace period or notice requirement, but there’s a good argument that any grace periods and notice requirements under the {{{{{1}}}|Credit Support Document}} in question would get pulled in by reference, so they are there in effect;
- {{{{{1}}}|Misrepresentation}} has neither a grace period or a notice requirement. The theory being a representation — any representation other than a tax one — being a statement inducing one to enter into the contract in the first place —is of such fundamental moment that its untruth justifies summary execution. Careful here, though, misrepresentations are a bit of a minefield to step through. See especially section {{{{{1}}}|3(d)}}.
- {{{{{1}}}|DUST}} references notice requirements and grace periods under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Transaction}} (where there is has been a default) but not where it is a repudiation, but that kind of figures.
- {{{{{1}}}|Cross Default}}, that most absurd of all {{{{{1}}}|Events of Default}}, has no notice requirement, no grace period, and doesn't even require the lender of the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} to have exercised a termination right — though any grace period under the {{{{{1}}}|Specified Indebtedness}} still applies.
- {{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} has no notice requirement or grace period (indeed, on {{{{{1}}}|Automatic Termination Event}} applies it may happens even without the {{{{{1}}}|Non-defaulting Party}}’s knowledge), though there are some grace periods under the various tedious limbs of {{{{{1}}}|Bankruptcy}} definition[1], and these vary by edition of the ISDA Master Agreement<ref>30 days in the 1992 ISDA, 15 days in the 2002 ISDA;
- {{{{{1}}}|Merger Without Assumption}} has neither notice requirement or grace period — again not unreasonable since a merger without assumption is tantamount to a repudiation of contract, and if you’re not playing the hermeneutic game no more, there is no reason I should.
- ↑ See for example Sections 5(a)(viii)(4) and (7).