Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|casenote| | {{casenote|a|casenote| | ||
[[File:JCLR.png|center|frameless|300px]] | [[File:JCLR.png|center|frameless|300px]] | ||
}}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk. | }}This is the present selection of cases in the [[Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports]], a reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly [[disclaimer|disclaimed]]. Use at your own risk. | ||
{{ | As at March 2002 this was the collection of cases: | ||
A | |||
*{{casenote|AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury}} | |||
B | |||
*{{casenote|Balfour v Balfour}} | |||
*{{casenote|Barclays v Unicredit}} | |||
*{{casenote|Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson}} | |||
C | |||
*{{casenote|Chudley v Clydesdale Bank plc}} | |||
*{{casenote|Concord Trust v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc}} | |||
*{{casenote|Covenant to execute | |||
*{{casenote|Crowther v Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} | |||
D | |||
*{{casenote|Donoghue v Stevenson}} | |||
*{{casenote|Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd}} | |||
E | |||
*{{casenote|Enron v TXU}} | |||
F | |||
*{{casenote|Fardell v Potts}} | |||
G | |||
*{{casenote|Geldof Metaalconstructie v Carves}} | |||
*{{casenote|Goldsworthy v Brickell}} | |||
*{{casenote|Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc}} | |||
H | |||
*{{casenote|Hadley v Baxendale}} | |||
*{{casenote|Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC}} | |||
*{{casenote|Heald v Kenworthy}} | |||
*{{casenote|Hedley Byrne v Heller}} | |||
*{{casenote|Henderson v Merrett}} | |||
L | |||
*{{casenote|Lisle-Mainwaring v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea}} | |||
*{{casenote|Lomas v Firth Rixson}} | |||
M | |||
*{{casenote|Marine Trade v Pioneer}} | |||
*{{casenote|Metavante v Lehman}} | |||
*{{casenote|Miller v Jackson}} | |||
N | |||
*{{casenote|National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen}} | |||
P | |||
*{{casenote|ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis}} | |||
*{{casenote|Pioneer v Cosco}} | |||
*{{casenote|Pioneer v TMT}} | |||
*{{casenote|Polypearl Limited v E.ON Energy Solutions Limited}} | |||
*{{casenote|Poretta v Superior Dowel Company}} | |||
*{{casenote|President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation}} | |||
R | |||
*{{casenote|RBS Rights Issue Litigation}} | |||
*{{casenote|Re Lehman Brothers International}} | |||
*{{casenote|Re Spectrum Plus}} | |||
*{{casenote|Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited}} | |||
*{{casenote|Rylands v Fletcher}} | |||
S | |||
*{{casenote|Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd}} | |||
*{{casenote|Secure Capital v Credit Suisse}} | |||
*{{casenote|Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation}} | |||
*{{casenote|Sturges v Bridgman}} | |||
T | |||
*{{casenote|Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank}} | |||
*{{casenote|Thompson v Davenport}} | |||
*{{casenote|Three Rivers No. 5}} | |||
U | |||
*{{casenote|Ultramares v Touche}} | |||
W | |||
*{{casenote|Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle}} | |||
*{{casenote|West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association Inc v Birmingham Corporation}} | |||
*{{casenote|Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions}} |
Revision as of 10:33, 21 March 2020
a v casenoteThis is the present selection of cases in the Jolly Contrarian’s Law Reports, a reporting service wholly unacknowledged by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. All responsibility for sober and sensible reproduction of the facts wholly disclaimed. Use at your own risk.
As at March 2002 this was the collection of cases:
A
- [[AP Picture Houses v Wednesbury v {{{2}}}]]
B
- [[Balfour v Balfour v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Barclays v Unicredit v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Bibby Financial Services Ltd v Magson v {{{2}}}]]
C
- [[Chudley v Clydesdale Bank plc v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Concord Trust v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v {{{2}}}]]
- {{casenote|Covenant to execute
- [[Crowther v Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd v {{{2}}}]]
D
- [[Donoghue v Stevenson v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd v {{{2}}}]]
E
- [[Enron v TXU v {{{2}}}]]
F
- [[Fardell v Potts v {{{2}}}]]
G
- [[Geldof Metaalconstructie v Carves v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Goldsworthy v Brickell v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Greenclose v National Westminster Bank plc v {{{2}}}]]
H
- [[Hadley v Baxendale v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Heald v Kenworthy v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Hedley Byrne v Heller v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Henderson v Merrett v {{{2}}}]]
L
- [[Lisle-Mainwaring v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Lomas v Firth Rixson v {{{2}}}]]
M
- [[Marine Trade v Pioneer v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Metavante v Lehman v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Miller v Jackson v {{{2}}}]]
N
- [[National Westminster Bank Ltd v Halesowen v {{{2}}}]]
P
- [[ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Pioneer v Cosco v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Pioneer v TMT v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Polypearl Limited v E.ON Energy Solutions Limited v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Poretta v Superior Dowel Company v {{{2}}}]]
- [[President of India v Lips Maritime Corporation v {{{2}}}]]
R
- [[RBS Rights Issue Litigation v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Re Lehman Brothers International v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Re Spectrum Plus v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Rylands v Fletcher v {{{2}}}]]
S
- [[Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Secure Capital v Credit Suisse v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Sturges v Bridgman v {{{2}}}]]
T
- [[Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Thompson v Davenport v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Three Rivers No. 5 v {{{2}}}]]
U
- [[Ultramares v Touche v {{{2}}}]]
W
- [[Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle v {{{2}}}]]
- [[West Midland Baptist (Trust) Association Inc v Birmingham Corporation v {{{2}}}]]
- [[Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions v {{{2}}}]]