Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 5(b)(v): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


Here’s a snapshot of the difference:
Here’s a snapshot of the difference:
 
[[File:CEUM delta.png|400px|thumb|left|What what once was, overlaid with what now is.]]
[[File:CEUM delta.png|450px|thumb|center|What what once was, overlaid with what now is.]]
On the other hand, you could count the number of times an {{isdama}} is closed out on account of {{isdaprov|Credit Event Upon Merger}} on the fingers of one hand, even if you had lost all the fingers on that hand to an industrial accident. So — yeah.

Revision as of 11:25, 12 April 2020

Numbering Discrepancy: Note the numbering discrepancy in Section 5(b) between the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA. This is caused by a new 5(b)(ii) (Force Majeure Event) in the 2002 ISDA before Tax Event, which is thus shunted from Section 5(b)(ii) (in the 1992 ISDA) to Section 5(b)(iii) (in the 2002 ISDA).

- Section 5(a)(viii) is Merger Without Assumption.

1992 ISDA upgrade

Even before the 2002 ISDA was published it was common to upgrade the 1992 ISDA formulation to something resembling the glorious concoction that became Section 5(b)(v) of the 2002 ISDA. The 1992 wording is a bit lame, really.

Here’s a snapshot of the difference:

What what once was, overlaid with what now is.

On the other hand, you could count the number of times an ISDA Master Agreement is closed out on account of Credit Event Upon Merger on the fingers of one hand, even if you had lost all the fingers on that hand to an industrial accident. So — yeah.