Change in Tax Law - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Replaced content with "{{manual|MI|2002|Change in Tax Law|Section|Change in Tax Law|medium}}" Tags: Replaced Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{manual|MI|2002|Change in Tax Law|Section|Change in Tax Law| | {{manual|MI|2002|Change in Tax Law|Section|Change in Tax Law|short}} |
Revision as of 21:19, 15 April 2020
2002 ISDA Master Agreement
Section Change in Tax Law in a Nutshell™ Use at your own risk, campers!
Full text of Section Change in Tax Law
Related agreements and comparisons
|
Content and comparisons
Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA Change in Tax Law
Summary
So one mild observation here is that this definition of a “Change in Tax Law” does not specifically mention, you know, tax per se. Which at first glance is odd.
This transpires not to matter, though, seeing as Change in Tax Law appears only twice in the 2002 ISDA, and in each case the context in which it appears is very specific to tax. They are:
- Section 2(d)(4)(B) (which deals with exclusions to the general requirement to gross up for Indemnifiable Taxes; and
- Section 5(b)(iii) (Tax Events), defining things that count as Tax Events by making an Affected Party more likely to suffer an Indemnifiable Tax.
The provisions surrounding gross up and termination and Indemnifiable Taxes are some of the most (linguistically) complicated in the ISDA Master Agreement, by the way.
See also
Template:M sa 2002 ISDA Change in Tax Law