Regulatory margin: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}
===EU===
===EU===
The [[regulatory technical standard]]s applying to enforceability of netting arrangements for {{tag|VM}} specifically refer to the criteria set out in Art {{crrprov|296}} of the [[Capital Requirements Regulation]] as satisfying the criteria – Art 296 as you know sets out the (Basel-dictated) standard for recognising netting for bank capital relief – i.e. this is exactly what the ISDA opinions and so on are directed at satisfying.
The [[regulatory technical standard]]s applying to enforceability of netting arrangements for {{tag|VM}} specifically refer to the criteria set out in Art {{crrprov|296}} of the [[Capital Requirements Regulation]] as satisfying the criteria – Art 296 as you know sets out the (Basel-dictated) standard for recognising netting for bank capital relief – i.e. this is exactly what the ISDA opinions and so on are directed at satisfying.

Revision as of 13:22, 15 May 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.


EU

The regulatory technical standards applying to enforceability of netting arrangements for VM specifically refer to the criteria set out in Art 296 of the Capital Requirements Regulation as satisfying the criteria – Art 296 as you know sets out the (Basel-dictated) standard for recognising netting for bank capital relief – i.e. this is exactly what the ISDA opinions and so on are directed at satisfying.

See also