Quod erat demonstrandum: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pe}}“[[Quod erat demonstrandum]]”. A jolly good {{tag|Latin}} expression, meaning “the very thing that you were trying to prove”; to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or be witty. But steer clear of it if you are trying to inform, because, [[Q.E.D.]], those without a classical education won’t understand it and may grow restive.
{{pe}}“[[Quod erat demonstrandum]]”. A jolly good {{tag|Latin}} expression, meaning “the very thing that you were trying to prove”; to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or be witty. But steer clear of it if you are trying to inform, because, [[Q.E.D.]], those without a classical education won’t understand it and may grow restive.
But it was in the ''Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy''.
:''Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
:''The argument goes something like this: “I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.”
:''“But,” says Man, “The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. [[Q.E.D.]].”
:''“Oh dear,” says God, “I hadn’t thought of that,” and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.


Also, my [[secret Latin advisor]] tells me, “demonstrandum” is a [[gerundive]]. Which is nice.
Also, my [[secret Latin advisor]] tells me, “demonstrandum” is a [[gerundive]]. Which is nice.

Revision as of 08:51, 17 June 2020

Towards more picturesque speech
SEC guidance on plain EnglishIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Quod erat demonstrandum”. A jolly good Latin expression, meaning “the very thing that you were trying to prove”; to be used when you are trying to show off, seem articulate or be witty. But steer clear of it if you are trying to inform, because, Q.E.D., those without a classical education won’t understand it and may grow restive.

But it was in the Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mind-bogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: “I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.”
“But,” says Man, “The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. Q.E.D..”
“Oh dear,” says God, “I hadn’t thought of that,” and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

Also, my secret Latin advisor tells me, “demonstrandum” is a gerundive. Which is nice.