Template:Isda Affected Transactions summ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
But why, really, would you want to capture just ''some'' {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} in an {{isdaprov|ATE}}? Well, there ''is'' a reason, though it is a fussy one: | But why, really, would you want to capture just ''some'' {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} in an {{isdaprov|ATE}}? Well, there ''is'' a reason, though it is a fussy one: | ||
{{Additional Representations as Termination Events}} | {{Additional Representations as Termination Events|{{{1}}}}} | ||
Mean time, there is a lot more about how pointlessly over-engineered this clause is at the commentary to Section {{{{{1}}}|6(b)(iv)}}, the {{{{{1}}}|Right to Terminate}}. | Mean time, there is a lot more about how pointlessly over-engineered this clause is at the commentary to Section {{{{{1}}}|6(b)(iv)}}, the {{{{{1}}}|Right to Terminate}}. | ||
Revision as of 12:10, 3 July 2020
Note that for {{{{{1}}}|Additional Termination Events}} and {{{{{1}}}|Credit Event Upon Merger}}, all {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} are automatically caught, and if you want to capture just certain {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}}, you'll need to tweak this definition too.
But why, really, would you want to capture just some {{{{{1}}}|Transactions}} in an ATE? Well, there is a reason, though it is a fussy one:
Template:Additional Representations as Termination Events
Mean time, there is a lot more about how pointlessly over-engineered this clause is at the commentary to Section {{{{{1}}}|6(b)(iv)}}, the {{{{{1}}}|Right to Terminate}}.