Tedium: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:''Words frequently change their meanings, and some even will go from meaning one thing to meaning something almost opposite (such as “nice”, which in its earliest use meant “lewd, wanton, dissolute”). [[Tedious]] is not one of these words; its meanings may have shifted over the centuries, but they have always had something to do with irksome, boring, or overlong things. The word comes from the Latin ''taedēre'', meaning “to disgust or weary.” Tedious has been in use since the 15th century and has been included in hundreds of dictionaries, although perhaps none have rendered so poetic and succinct a definition as Nathaniel Bailey’s entry in his 1756 New Universal Etymological English Dictionary: “Wearisome by continuance.”'' | :''Words frequently change their meanings, and some even will go from meaning one thing to meaning something almost opposite (such as “nice”, which in its earliest use meant “lewd, wanton, dissolute”). [[Tedious]] is not one of these words; its meanings may have shifted over the centuries, but they have always had something to do with irksome, boring, or overlong things. The word comes from the Latin ''taedēre'', meaning “to disgust or weary.” Tedious has been in use since the 15th century and has been included in hundreds of dictionaries, although perhaps none have rendered so poetic and succinct a definition as Nathaniel Bailey’s entry in his 1756 New Universal Etymological English Dictionary: “Wearisome by continuance.”'' | ||
===Tedium and interest=== | ===Tedium and interest=== | ||
I can’t prove this, but, in the same way that “[[Antifragile|robust is not the opposite of fragile]]”, [[tedious]] is ''not'' the opposite of “interesting”. There is an intermediate purgatorial state which is not particularly [[interesting]] | I can’t prove this, but, in the same way that “[[Antifragile|robust is not the opposite of fragile]]”, “[[tedious]]” is ''not'' the opposite of “interesting”. There is an intermediate purgatorial state which is not particularly [[interesting]], but is not especially tedious either. Bruce Springsteen’s album ''Nebraska'', for example. | ||
[[Tedium]] describes any activity which, when you stand back and look at it, serves no [[Substance|real purpose]], however ''[[form]]ally'' emollient it may feel. Given how utterly pervasive it is in modern corporate life, it is extraordinary no more research has been done into what tedium is and why we are obliged to endure it. | [[Tedium]] describes any activity which, when you stand back and look at it, serves no [[Substance|real purpose]], however ''[[form]]ally'' emollient it may feel. Given how utterly pervasive it is in modern corporate life, it is extraordinary no more research has been done into what tedium is and why we are obliged to endure it. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Box ticking]] | |||
*The [[JC]]’s [[laws of worker entropy]] | *The [[JC]]’s [[laws of worker entropy]] | ||
*The [[seven wastes of negotiation]] | *The [[seven wastes of negotiation]] | ||
{{c|entropy}} | {{c|entropy}} | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 15 July 2020
|
A short, tedious history.
Merriam Webster is amusing on the etymology:
- Words frequently change their meanings, and some even will go from meaning one thing to meaning something almost opposite (such as “nice”, which in its earliest use meant “lewd, wanton, dissolute”). Tedious is not one of these words; its meanings may have shifted over the centuries, but they have always had something to do with irksome, boring, or overlong things. The word comes from the Latin taedēre, meaning “to disgust or weary.” Tedious has been in use since the 15th century and has been included in hundreds of dictionaries, although perhaps none have rendered so poetic and succinct a definition as Nathaniel Bailey’s entry in his 1756 New Universal Etymological English Dictionary: “Wearisome by continuance.”
Tedium and interest
I can’t prove this, but, in the same way that “robust is not the opposite of fragile”, “tedious” is not the opposite of “interesting”. There is an intermediate purgatorial state which is not particularly interesting, but is not especially tedious either. Bruce Springsteen’s album Nebraska, for example.
Tedium describes any activity which, when you stand back and look at it, serves no real purpose, however formally emollient it may feel. Given how utterly pervasive it is in modern corporate life, it is extraordinary no more research has been done into what tedium is and why we are obliged to endure it.
If, as a young clerk, re-dating a stack of trust deeds at 3 in the morning after a bished execution[1], you have ever regarded the clock, shaken your head and asked yourself, “is there really no better way to do this?” then you have looked into the tedial abyss. Careful, lest it looks back into you.
Superficial tedium versus intrinsic tedium
Most meetings are tedious. Almost all operating committees are. But — and loathe as I am to speak a word in support of these ghastly assemblies, here goes — the idea of an opco isn’t utterly stupid: in a large organisation oversight of the distributed governance is important, so the onus is on those presenting at opcos to present material that is innately important, and therefore interesting — and no, internal audit, that does not include news of your own internal reorganisation — in a way that is likely to impact somehow on the consciousness of those poor saps required to attend.
VARY YOUR TONE, FOR GOD’S SAKE. LEARN THE BASIC RUDIMENTS OF HOW TO ADDRESS A LARGE GROUP OF PEOPLE.
Speak to your slides: don’t just read the godforsaken things out.
The third law of worker entropy
The JC’s third law of worker entropy, also known as “the law of inevitable tedium”: There is a 100% correlation between
- (i) activities that, however important they might seem, in fact have no value, and
- (ii) activities that are tedious.
All other things being equal, if an activity is tedious, it is wasteful. If it is wasteful, you shouldn’t do it.
If an activity is 25% tedious it is 25% wasteful.
See also
References
- ↑ You may think this ha the searing scar of verisimilitude about it. You would be right.