Chatbot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|tech|[[File:Gort.jpg|450px|center|What’s a cute little neural network like you doing in a place like this anyway?]]}} | {{a|tech|[[File:Gort.jpg|450px|center|thumb|What’s a cute little neural network like you doing in a place like this anyway?]]}} | ||
:{{JC on technology}} | :{{JC on technology}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin Media’s godforsaken internet service doesn’t it? | Why not just use a [[chatbot]]? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin Media’s godforsaken internet service doesn’t it? | ||
{{Sa}} | {{Sa}} | ||
*{{Br|A World Without Work}} | |||
*[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | *[[Why is reg tech so disappointing?]] | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 7 August 2020
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series. .jpg)
|
- “Any sufficiently primitive middle manager will be unable to distinguish a basic chatbot from magic.”
- —JC’s sixth law of worker entropy
It’s just so obvious when you think about it.
Lawyers are ornery, craggy, expensive and equivocal, and if they do give you a straight anwer it will be so hamstrung by double negatives, passives and arcane constructions that most likely you won’t understand what they say anyway.
Why not just use a chatbot? It works okay for triaging customer complaints about Virgin Media’s godforsaken internet service doesn’t it?