Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 5(a)(v): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Two key differences between the {{1992ma}} {{isda92prov|DUST}} and the {{2002ma}} {{isdaprov|DUST}}: The {{2002ma}} version is updated:
{{isda 5(a)(v) comm|isdaprov}}
*'''[[mini-closeout]] carveout''': to exclude “defaults” which qualify as mini closeouts under stock loan documentation — a concept which the stock loan market invented after the {{1992ma}} was published, so you can’t really blame {{icds}} for overlooking it at first — as these tend to arise from normal market settlement failures and are not credit-driven, and
*'''[[Repudiation]] evidence''': to stiffen the criteria for something to count as a repudiation so as to require [[In writing|written evidence]] from the repudiating party of its [[extended middle finger]]. The latter of these really more am articulation of common sense, for it would be a brave risk officer indeed who closed out an {{isdama}} based on an oral communication, or the [[proverbial extended middle finger]], for which she could not subsequently produce in fairly compelling evidence. But still.


The [[mini closeout]] point, as we discuss in the commentary below, is technically correct but should have led to a ''simplification'' of the DUST provision, rather than a ''convolution'' of it. I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right: like ''that'' was ever going to happen.
The [[mini closeout]] point, as we discuss in the commentary below, is technically correct but should have led to a ''simplification'' of the DUST provision, rather than a ''convolution'' of it. I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right: like ''that'' was ever going to happen.

Revision as of 10:56, 24 September 2020

DUST has been expanded in five significant ways by the 2002 ISDA. See the summary and general sections for details.

The mini closeout point, as we discuss in the commentary below, is technically correct but should have led to a simplification of the DUST provision, rather than a convolution of it. I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right: like that was ever going to happen.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_comp_disc_2002_ISDA_5(a)(v)&oldid=47287"