Rent-seeking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}{{a|tech|}}[[Rent-seeking]] is the Marxist (ooh! saucy!) term when a fellow (a “[[rentier]]”) monopolises access to [[property]] (including, for modern readings, [[intellectual property]]) and gouging profits out of it. | {{g}}{{a|tech|}}[[Rent-seeking]] is the Marxist (ooh! saucy!) term when a fellow (a “[[rentier]]”) monopolises access to [[property]] (including, for modern readings, [[intellectual property]]) and gouging profits out of it. | ||
Rather than the fruits of your blood, toil, tears and sweat you use antediluvian<ref>{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}’s {{Br|Code: Version 2.0}} is a compulsory read.</ref> [[intellectual property]] rules to gouge everyone else. | It comes in many guises: | ||
*[[Physical property]] — you know, ''literal'' rent-seeking | |||
*[[Intellectual property]] — Rather than using the fruits of your blood, toil, tears and sweat you use antediluvian<ref>{{author|Lawrence Lessig}}’s {{Br|Code: Version 2.0}} is a compulsory read.</ref> [[intellectual property]] rules to gouge everyone else. In this way Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can extract millions over 60 years from 15 minutes of work — in Richards’ case, while he was asleep — composing ''[[Satisfaction]]''. | |||
*[[Franchising]]: Taking an idea or a business model someone else has invented — McDonald’s is the best example — and paying them a franchise fee to operate it. Here is ''double'' rent-seeking: the franchisee pays the franchisor, and the customer pays the ''franchisee''. | |||
*[[Software as a service]]: The simple answer to the question [[why is reg tech so disappointing?]] — is that tech businesses can’t make money if all they get paid for is writing software. This would be like Mick Jagger only getting paid for fifteen minutes’ work — where is the logic, or the justice in that? | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Reg tech]] | *[[Reg tech]] | ||
*[[Intermediaries]] | *[[Intermediaries]] | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} | ||
Revision as of 09:34, 19 November 2020
|
|
JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
Rent-seeking is the Marxist (ooh! saucy!) term when a fellow (a “rentier”) monopolises access to property (including, for modern readings, intellectual property) and gouging profits out of it.
It comes in many guises:
- Physical property — you know, literal rent-seeking
- Intellectual property — Rather than using the fruits of your blood, toil, tears and sweat you use antediluvian[1] intellectual property rules to gouge everyone else. In this way Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can extract millions over 60 years from 15 minutes of work — in Richards’ case, while he was asleep — composing Satisfaction.
- Franchising: Taking an idea or a business model someone else has invented — McDonald’s is the best example — and paying them a franchise fee to operate it. Here is double rent-seeking: the franchisee pays the franchisor, and the customer pays the franchisee.
- Software as a service: The simple answer to the question why is reg tech so disappointing? — is that tech businesses can’t make money if all they get paid for is writing software. This would be like Mick Jagger only getting paid for fifteen minutes’ work — where is the logic, or the justice in that?
See also
References
- ↑ Lawrence Lessig’s Code: Version 2.0 is a compulsory read.