Intermediate broker: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{g}}In the world of [[exchange-traded instrument]]s, a [[broker]] who occupies the dun netherworld between a [[client]]-facing [[executing broker]] and the [[exchange]] or [[CCP]]-facing [[clearing member]]. May or may not be affiliated with the [[executing broker]].
{{g}}In the world of [[exchange-traded instrument]]s, a [[broker]] who occupies the [[entropy|dun netherworld between a [[client]]-facing [[executing broker]] and the [[exchange]] or [[CCP]]-facing [[clearing member]]. May or may not be affiliated with the [[executing broker]].


Of interest<ref>Professional interest, needless to say.</ref> because:  
Of interest<ref>Professional interest, needless to say.</ref> because:  
*An [[intermediate broker]] it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under {{tag|EMIR}}
*An [[intermediate broker]] it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under {{tag|EMIR}}
*It may present a [[risk-weighting problem to you  under {{tag|CRR}} if you don’t pass on all solvency relates losses as contemplated in Art {{crrprov|306(1)(c)}} of that glorious regulation.
*It may present a [[RWA|risk-weighting]] problem to you  under {{tag|CRR}} if you don’t pass on all solvency relates losses as contemplated in Art {{crrprov|306(1)(c)}} of that glorious regulation.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Revision as of 09:24, 6 December 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

In the world of exchange-traded instruments, a broker who occupies the [[entropy|dun netherworld between a client-facing executing broker and the exchange or CCP-facing clearing member. May or may not be affiliated with the executing broker.

Of interest[1] because:

  • An intermediate broker it might prolong a clearing chain beyond the permissible number of links under EMIR
  • It may present a risk-weighting problem to you under CRR if you don’t pass on all solvency relates losses as contemplated in Art 306(1)(c) of that glorious regulation.

See also

References

  1. Professional interest, needless to say.