Inhouse counsel: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{def|Inhouse counsel|/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/|n||[[File:Legal eagle.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[legal eagle]] yesterday.]]}}A peculiar breed of [[legal eagle|legal wordwright]] whose expertise chiefly resides in knowing enough about the law to frame the right question for someone else, but artfully [[Disclaimer|disclaiming]] enough knowledge to actually answer it; and the tactical acumen to throw such a hospital pass to such an unsuspecting third party without anyone twigging that she has done it. You can find detailed criteria — what it takes to excel at the job of steering emails — [[Inhouse legal team of the year|here]].
{{def|Inhouse counsel|/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/|n||[[File:Legal eagle.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[legal eagle]] yesterday.]]}}A peculiar breed of wordwright whose chief expertise resides in (i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but [[Disclaimer|disclaiming]] enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and (ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it.  
 
You can find detailed criteria — what it takes to excel at the job of steering emails — [[Inhouse legal team of the year|here]].


The person who proves best at this behaviour over a sustained period of time gets to be [[general counsel]].
The person who proves best at this behaviour over a sustained period of time gets to be [[general counsel]].

Revision as of 15:59, 13 December 2020

The Jolly Contrarian’s Dictionary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™

Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Inhouse counsel /ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/ (n.)
A peculiar breed of wordwright whose chief expertise resides in (i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but disclaiming enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and (ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it.

You can find detailed criteria — what it takes to excel at the job of steering emails — here.

The person who proves best at this behaviour over a sustained period of time gets to be general counsel.

See also