Children of the Woods: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{a|myth|}}The [[Children of the Forest]] were a prehistoric proto-civilisation of woodland sprites and hippies; a kind of peaceable pre-derivative, banking people, largely unconcerned with material wealth but blessed with a preternatural gift for option pricing. They roamed the moors and fens of England semi-naked in the time before the alliance of men and elves. Alas, they modeled their [[delta]] by using profoundly flawed [[VAR|value-at-risk]] techniques and wildly miscalculated their exposure to the [[First Men]], a marauding race of American [[derivatives]] [[salesmen]] who wiped them out in the late 1980s in one big bang, but not before they left behind traces of their contribution: the {{1985ma}} and the {{isdaprov|Cross Default}} clause, which ''still'' afflicts the {{isdama}} to this day. | ||
{{Sa}} | {{Sa}} | ||
*The [[First Men]] | *The [[First Men]] | ||
*{{1985ma}} | *{{1985ma}} | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 18 December 2020
|
The Children of the Forest were a prehistoric proto-civilisation of woodland sprites and hippies; a kind of peaceable pre-derivative, banking people, largely unconcerned with material wealth but blessed with a preternatural gift for option pricing. They roamed the moors and fens of England semi-naked in the time before the alliance of men and elves. Alas, they modeled their delta by using profoundly flawed value-at-risk techniques and wildly miscalculated their exposure to the First Men, a marauding race of American derivatives salesmen who wiped them out in the late 1980s in one big bang, but not before they left behind traces of their contribution: the 1985 ISDA Code and the Cross Default clause, which still afflicts the ISDA Master Agreement to this day.