Tax Event - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{isdasnap|Tax Event}} | {{isdasnap|Tax Event}} | ||
{{isdasnap2|5(b)(ii)|5(b)(iii)}} | {{isdasnap2|5(b)(ii)|5(b)(iii)}} | ||
===Commentary=== | |||
Note, unhelpfully, the subpara reference in the {{1992ma}} is (1) and (2) and in the {{2002ma}} is (A) and (B). Note, also unhelpfully, that this paragraph is a bastard to understand. Let's have a look then: | Note, unhelpfully, the subpara reference in the {{1992ma}} is (1) and (2) and in the {{2002ma}} is (A) and (B). Note, also unhelpfully, that this paragraph is a bastard to understand. Let's have a look then: | ||
{{quote|A "'''{{isdaprov|Tax Event}}'''" is a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} whereby, following a change in tax law or practice after | {{quote|A "'''{{isdaprov|Tax Event}}'''" is a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} whereby, following a change in tax law or practice after any trade date, an "{{isdaprov|Affected Party}}" is likely to have to either | ||
:(1) [[Gross Up]] an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}} deduction or | |||
:(2) receive a payment net of {{isdaprov|Tax}} which the {{isdaprov|Non-Affected Party}} is not required to Gross Up.}} | |||
Not such a bastard after all, then. | |||
{{isdaanatomy}} | {{isdaanatomy}} |
Revision as of 15:34, 14 February 2013
Numbering Discrepancy: Note the numbering discrepancy in Section 5(b) between the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA. This is caused by a new 5(b)(ii) (Force Majeure Event) in the 2002 ISDA before Tax Event, which is thus shunted from Section 5(b)(ii) (in the 1992 ISDA) to Section 5(b)(iii) (in the 2002 ISDA).
In gory detail
|
|
Commentary
Note, unhelpfully, the subpara reference in the 1992 ISDA is (1) and (2) and in the 2002 ISDA is (A) and (B). Note, also unhelpfully, that this paragraph is a bastard to understand. Let's have a look then:
A "Tax Event" is a Termination Event whereby, following a change in tax law or practice after any trade date, an "Affected Party" is likely to have to either
- (1) Gross Up an Indemnifiable Tax deduction or
- (2) receive a payment net of Tax which the Non-Affected Party is not required to Gross Up.
Not such a bastard after all, then.
- ↑ The line breaks are for comprehension and do not appear in the original