Template:M summ GMSLA 12: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
===Gross up ({{gmslaprov|12.2(d)}})===
===Gross up ({{gmslaprov|12.2(d)}})===
[[12 - GMSLA Provision|Expect]] some ninja swordplay on the extent of the [[gross up]] in {{gmslaprov|12.2(d)}}.  
[[12 - GMSLA Provision|Expect]] some ninja swordplay in the {{gmslaprov|Schedule}} on the extent of the [[gross up]] in {{gmslaprov|12.2(d)}}, especially if your counterparty has any particular warm feelings towards America. You may see all sorts of special pleadings about US Federal incomes taxes, hat-doffing to the sainted [[Internal Revenue Code of 1986]], provisions exempting gross ups as a result of Section [[871(m)]] and all that good stuff.


For one thing, adding in some exemption for [[871(m)]]; another favourite trick is to try to harmonise with the {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}es regime of the {{isdama}}, by carving out a [[gross up]] obligation to the extent it is a function of the gross-up recipient’s tax status with the withholding jurisdiction:  
Another favourite trick is to try to harmonise with the {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}es regime of the {{isdama}}, by carving out a [[gross up]] obligation to the extent it is a function of the gross-up recipient’s tax status with the withholding jurisdiction:  
:“such Tax would not have been imposed but for a present or former connection between the jurisdiction imposing such Tax and the Recipient (other than the mere receipt of payment from Payer or the performance of Recipient’s obligations hereunder)”
:“such Tax would not have been imposed but for a present or former connection between the jurisdiction imposing such Tax and the Recipient (other than the mere receipt of payment from Payer or the performance of Recipient’s obligations hereunder)”
You might think this a little tiresome. I couldn’t possibly comment.
===Sales Tax ({{gmslaprov|12.6}})===
===Sales Tax ({{gmslaprov|12.6}})===
{{gmslaprov|Sales Tax}} is defined in Paragraph {{gmslaprov|2.1}} as:  
{{gmslaprov|Sales Tax}} is defined in Paragraph {{gmslaprov|2.1}} as:  

Latest revision as of 17:57, 19 January 2021

Gross up (12.2(d))

Expect some ninja swordplay in the Schedule on the extent of the gross up in 12.2(d), especially if your counterparty has any particular warm feelings towards America. You may see all sorts of special pleadings about US Federal incomes taxes, hat-doffing to the sainted Internal Revenue Code of 1986, provisions exempting gross ups as a result of Section 871(m) and all that good stuff.

Another favourite trick is to try to harmonise with the Indemnifiable Taxes regime of the ISDA Master Agreement, by carving out a gross up obligation to the extent it is a function of the gross-up recipient’s tax status with the withholding jurisdiction:

“such Tax would not have been imposed but for a present or former connection between the jurisdiction imposing such Tax and the Recipient (other than the mere receipt of payment from Payer or the performance of Recipient’s obligations hereunder)”

You might think this a little tiresome. I couldn’t possibly comment.

Sales Tax (12.6)

Sales Tax is defined in Paragraph 2.1 as:

Sales Tax means value added tax and any other Tax of a similar nature (including, without limitation, any sales tax of any relevant jurisdiction);

For this bear of little brain this is a little ambiguous. Does this mean the Party who suffers the Sales Tax must pay it to the taxing authority upon receipt of an invoice, or does it mean the person who doesn’t suffer the Sales Tax must gross the other Party up?