Tort: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:11, 30 March 2021

The basic principles of tort
A Jolly Contrarian guide to loving thy neighbour™

Contract — quasi-contract — quasi-agency — tort — restitution Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Tort Contract Restitution

Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Not a torte.
Nor, for that matter, a breach of contract.

You might wish to consider negligence, or indeed that trifecta of mediocre drafting negligence, fraud or wilful misconduct, for more information.

But don’t be a nuisance.^[1] Unless you're playing cricket.

C’mon, there’s some good material here folks.

↑
Here all week, folks!
This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.

Revision as of 19:18, 23 February 2020 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,414 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:11, 30 March 2021 view source Amwelladmin (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 88,414 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{a\|~~glossary~~\|}}Not a [[torte]]. <br />		{{a\|tort\|}}Not a [[torte]]. <br />
	Nor, for that matter, a breach of {{tag\|contract}}.		Nor, for that matter, a breach of {{tag\|contract}}.