Template:Severability boilerplate capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Severability is boilerplate the JC has a hard time understanding the logic of in any weather, but you can see purveyors of top quality finance contracts harbouring..."
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
Severability is [[boilerplate]] the [[JC]] has a hard time understanding the logic of in any weather, but you can see purveyors of top quality [[finance contracts]] harbouring a tightness in the jaw at the thought that if I agree to lend you six squillion smackeroonies and you agree to repay in one year with interest ''and provide me one bowl of [[Brown M&Ms|M&Ms per week with the brown ones removed]]'', then if it becomes illegal supply enormous financial institutions with bowls of M&Ms (look, let’s just say OK?), that doesn’t let you off your loan repayment or interest obligations. This seems less of a monstrously critical risk for me if the [[fruits of the contract|contractual fruits]] I am expecting from you ''do not include your repayment of six squillion smackeroonies''.
Severability is [[boilerplate]] the [[JC]] has a hard time understanding the logic of in any weather, but you can see purveyors of top quality [[finance contract]]s harbouring a tightness in the jaw at the thought that if I agree to lend you six squillion smackeroonies and you agree to repay in one year with interest ''and provide me one bowl of [[Brown M&Ms|M&Ms per week with the brown ones removed]]'', then if it becomes illegal supply enormous financial institutions with bowls of M&Ms (look, let’s just say OK?), that doesn’t let you off your loan repayment or interest obligations. This seems less of a monstrously critical risk for me if the [[fruits of the contract|contractual fruits]] I am expecting from you ''do not include your repayment of six squillion smackeroonies''.

Revision as of 20:40, 7 June 2021

Severability is boilerplate the JC has a hard time understanding the logic of in any weather, but you can see purveyors of top quality finance contracts harbouring a tightness in the jaw at the thought that if I agree to lend you six squillion smackeroonies and you agree to repay in one year with interest and provide me one bowl of M&Ms per week with the brown ones removed, then if it becomes illegal supply enormous financial institutions with bowls of M&Ms (look, let’s just say OK?), that doesn’t let you off your loan repayment or interest obligations. This seems less of a monstrously critical risk for me if the contractual fruits I am expecting from you do not include your repayment of six squillion smackeroonies.