Template:Ddq capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''The [[JC]]’s practical guide for [[legal eagle]]s on how to respond to requests to help fill out [[due diligence questionnaire]]s:'' | ''The [[JC]]’s practical guide for [[legal eagle]]s on how to respond to requests to help fill out [[due diligence questionnaire]]s:'' | ||
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers: | Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers: | ||
{{quote|EITHER | |||
“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a [[due diligence questionnaire]]. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”}} | |||
{{quote|“That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in [[operations]].”}} | {{quote|OR | ||
“That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in [[operations]].”}} |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 23 June 2021
The JC’s practical guide for legal eagles on how to respond to requests to help fill out due diligence questionnaires:
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:
EITHER
“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a due diligence questionnaire. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”
OR
“That is a matter of fact. I am a lawyer. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in operations.”