Purpose: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed redirect to Purpose - OneNDA provision)
Tag: Removed redirect
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|}}''For the Purpose of a, NDA, see [[Purpose - Confi Provision]]''
{{a|design|}}''For the Purpose of a, NDA, see [[Purpose - Confi Provision]]''


A typically derivative essay on the wonderful Fender Stratocaster got us thinking about how the design imperatives in a process may differ at different points in that process. If we take the Strat’s overall lifecycle to include its manufacture, marketing, use, maintenance and eventual retirement — rock ’n’ roll will never die, of course — then we can see that the design imperatives for the different phases of its life change. during manufacture, the design imperatives are ease of assembly, configuration and sale. Once assembled, configured and sold, these design imperatives largely disappear. A single careful owner cares not how easy it is to install the tremolo or wire the pickguard. She cares about only how to make, as Frank Zappa put it, “the disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar”.
A typically derivative essay on the wonderful Fender Stratocaster got us thinking about how the design imperatives in a process may differ at different points in that process.  
 
If we take the Strat’s overall lifecycle to include its manufacture, marketing, use, maintenance and eventual retirement — rock ’n’ roll will never die, of course — then we can see that the design imperatives for the different phases of its life change. during manufacture, the design imperatives are ease of assembly, configuration and sale. Once assembled, configured and sold, these design imperatives largely disappear. A single careful owner cares not how easy it is to install the tremolo or wire the pickguard. She cares about only how to make, as Frank Zappa put it, “the disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar”.
 
Upshot: how easy the guitar is for a machinist or an electrician to “use” is not the same question as how easy it is for a player or a repairer to “use”. The real genius of the Strat is how fabulously it delivers for ''all'' these users.
 
Hypothesis, therefore: great [[design]] works for all phases, and all users, of an artefact throughout its production and use.
 
[[Metaphor]] over. Let us know tearing ourselves away from Leo Fender’s wonderful creation and think about legal process.

Revision as of 10:25, 28 September 2021

The design of organisations and products


Making legal contracts a better experience
Index — Click ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

For the Purpose of a, NDA, see Purpose - Confi Provision

A typically derivative essay on the wonderful Fender Stratocaster got us thinking about how the design imperatives in a process may differ at different points in that process.

If we take the Strat’s overall lifecycle to include its manufacture, marketing, use, maintenance and eventual retirement — rock ’n’ roll will never die, of course — then we can see that the design imperatives for the different phases of its life change. during manufacture, the design imperatives are ease of assembly, configuration and sale. Once assembled, configured and sold, these design imperatives largely disappear. A single careful owner cares not how easy it is to install the tremolo or wire the pickguard. She cares about only how to make, as Frank Zappa put it, “the disgusting stink of a too-loud electric guitar”.

Upshot: how easy the guitar is for a machinist or an electrician to “use” is not the same question as how easy it is for a player or a repairer to “use”. The real genius of the Strat is how fabulously it delivers for all these users.

Hypothesis, therefore: great design works for all phases, and all users, of an artefact throughout its production and use.

Metaphor over. Let us know tearing ourselves away from Leo Fender’s wonderful creation and think about legal process.