Legaltech landscape: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{a|devil|}}With gratitude to {{author|Alex Hamilton}} for setting this out in his excellent book {{br|Sign Here}}, here is a ''functional'' breakdown of the contract tech..." |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
!Phase | |||
!Function | |||
!Description | |||
!Management appreciation factor | |||
!Lawyer acceptance factor | |||
!Glamour factor | |||
!Iatrogenic factor | |||
|- | |||
|''Phase of contract process'' | |||
|''What does the bit of kit do?'' | |||
|''Explain?'' | |||
|''How excited will management be about this?'' | |||
|''What is lawyer acceptance factor: the realistic chance that legal eagles will wholeheartedly embrace this tool?'' | |||
|''How clever, complicated or unique is this as a piece of technology?'' | |||
|''How far might this tool inadvertently entrench current rent-seeking behaviour?'' | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan="3" |Initiation | |||
|Law firm bid management | |||
|An auction portal for seeking competitive bids on external legal advisory projects | |||
|'''High''': delivers control, visibility, metrics and cost pressure on external counsel | |||
|'''Low''': While no work to implement for lawyers, it removes autonomy, power to choose counsel, is unpopular with outside counsel as any bidding system guarantees more losers than winners. | |||
|'''Low''': It’s eBay or Uber, isn’t it? | |||
|'''High''': Asks wrong question, namely: “how to I get the cheapest legal advice” rather than “how to I get the best advice or, for that matter, “do I need legal advice at all”. | |||
|- | |||
|Self-service portal | |||
|A place where Sales can go to get pre-appoved legal forms to send out without vetting | |||
|'''High''': Speeds things up and pushes away low value work from Legal | |||
|'''Medium''': anything that pushes NDAs off the desk has to be a good thing. | |||
|'''Low''': Could be as easy as an intranet page or SharePoint | |||
|'''Low''': disintermediates unnecessary legal touch. | |||
|- | |||
|Initiation and prioritisation tool | |||
|A system for queueing prospects, getting necessary information and prioritising before starting negotiation | |||
|'''High''': Good oversight of process, good MIS | |||
|'''Medium''': Helps initiate drafting provided it is used properly and information accurately provided | |||
|'''Low''': Doesn’t need much tech. | |||
|'''Low''': Disintermediates. Provides simple information inputs and disciplines personnel to follow process. | |||
|- | |||
|Drafting | |||
|Template Management | |||
|Centralised templates database or clause library for approving and warehousing approved forms and boilerplate | |||
|Medium: Should drive efficiency | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Document Automation | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Freehand Document Assembly | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Negotiation | |||
|Document mananagement system | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Automated contract review | |||
|AI contract review and markup tools | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Manual review assistance | |||
|Comparison, formatting tools, | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Negotiation platforms/portal | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Execution | |||
|Execution Approval | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Digital execution | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Contract Management | |||
|Contract management | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Metadata extraction | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Obligation management | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Tracking | |||
|Onboarding process management | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Legal term benchmarking | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |||
With gratitude to {{author|Alex Hamilton}} for setting this out in his excellent book {{br|Sign Here}}, here is a ''functional'' breakdown of the [[contract tech]] landscape — as Alex points out, any of these functions are captured by more than one tool — itself a commercial problem for Vendors, becasue no-one likes to buy duplications: |
Revision as of 09:24, 4 October 2021
Phase | Function | Description | Management appreciation factor | Lawyer acceptance factor | Glamour factor | Iatrogenic factor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase of contract process | What does the bit of kit do? | Explain? | How excited will management be about this? | What is lawyer acceptance factor: the realistic chance that legal eagles will wholeheartedly embrace this tool? | How clever, complicated or unique is this as a piece of technology? | How far might this tool inadvertently entrench current rent-seeking behaviour? |
Initiation | Law firm bid management | An auction portal for seeking competitive bids on external legal advisory projects | High: delivers control, visibility, metrics and cost pressure on external counsel | Low: While no work to implement for lawyers, it removes autonomy, power to choose counsel, is unpopular with outside counsel as any bidding system guarantees more losers than winners. | Low: It’s eBay or Uber, isn’t it? | High: Asks wrong question, namely: “how to I get the cheapest legal advice” rather than “how to I get the best advice or, for that matter, “do I need legal advice at all”. |
Self-service portal | A place where Sales can go to get pre-appoved legal forms to send out without vetting | High: Speeds things up and pushes away low value work from Legal | Medium: anything that pushes NDAs off the desk has to be a good thing. | Low: Could be as easy as an intranet page or SharePoint | Low: disintermediates unnecessary legal touch. | |
Initiation and prioritisation tool | A system for queueing prospects, getting necessary information and prioritising before starting negotiation | High: Good oversight of process, good MIS | Medium: Helps initiate drafting provided it is used properly and information accurately provided | Low: Doesn’t need much tech. | Low: Disintermediates. Provides simple information inputs and disciplines personnel to follow process. | |
Drafting | Template Management | Centralised templates database or clause library for approving and warehousing approved forms and boilerplate | Medium: Should drive efficiency | |||
Document Automation | ||||||
Freehand Document Assembly | ||||||
Negotiation | Document mananagement system | |||||
Automated contract review | AI contract review and markup tools | |||||
Manual review assistance | Comparison, formatting tools, | |||||
Negotiation platforms/portal | ||||||
Execution | Execution Approval | |||||
Digital execution | ||||||
Contract Management | Contract management | |||||
Metadata extraction | ||||||
Obligation management | ||||||
Tracking | Onboarding process management | |||||
Legal term benchmarking |
With gratitude to Alex Hamilton for setting this out in his excellent book Sign Here, here is a functional breakdown of the contract tech landscape — as Alex points out, any of these functions are captured by more than one tool — itself a commercial problem for Vendors, becasue no-one likes to buy duplications: