Legaltech landscape: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|devil|}}With gratitude to {{author|Alex Hamilton}} for setting this out in his excellent book {{br|Sign Here}}, here is a ''functional'' breakdown of the contract tech..."
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|devil|}}With gratitude to {{author|Alex Hamilton}} for setting this out in his excellent book {{br|Sign Here}}, here is a ''functional'' breakdown of the [[contract tech]] landscape — as Alex points out, any of these functions are captured by more than one tool — itself a commercial problem for Vendors, becasue no-one likes to buy duplications:
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!Phase
!Function
!Description
!Management appreciation factor
!Lawyer acceptance factor
!Glamour factor
!Iatrogenic factor
|-
|''Phase of contract process''
|''What does the bit of kit do?''
|''Explain?''
|''How excited will management be about this?''
|''What is  lawyer acceptance factor: the realistic chance that legal eagles will wholeheartedly embrace this tool?''
|''How clever,  complicated or unique is this as a piece of technology?''
|''How far might this tool inadvertently entrench current rent-seeking behaviour?''
|-
| rowspan="3" |Initiation
|Law firm bid management
|An auction portal for seeking competitive bids on external legal advisory projects
|'''High''': delivers control, visibility, metrics and cost pressure on external counsel
|'''Low''': While no work to implement for lawyers, it removes autonomy, power to choose counsel, is unpopular with outside counsel as any bidding system guarantees more losers than winners.
|'''Low''': It’s eBay or Uber, isn’t it?
|'''High''': Asks wrong question, namely: “how to I get the cheapest legal advice” rather than “how to I get the best advice or, for that matter, “do I need legal advice at all”.
|-
|Self-service portal
|A place where Sales can go to get pre-appoved legal forms to send out without vetting
|'''High''': Speeds things up and pushes away low value work from Legal
|'''Medium''': anything that pushes NDAs off the desk has to be a good thing.
|'''Low''': Could be as easy as an intranet page or SharePoint
|'''Low''': disintermediates unnecessary legal touch.
|-
|Initiation and prioritisation tool
|A system for queueing prospects, getting necessary information and prioritising before starting negotiation
|'''High''': Good oversight of process, good MIS
|'''Medium''': Helps initiate drafting provided it is used properly and information accurately provided
|'''Low''': Doesn’t need much tech.
|'''Low''': Disintermediates. Provides simple information inputs and disciplines personnel to follow process.
|-
|Drafting
|Template Management
|Centralised templates database or clause library for approving and warehousing approved forms and boilerplate
|Medium: Should drive efficiency
|
|
|
|-
|
|Document Automation
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Freehand Document Assembly
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Negotiation
|Document mananagement system
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Automated contract review
|AI contract review and markup tools
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Manual review assistance
|Comparison, formatting tools,
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Negotiation platforms/portal
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Execution
|Execution Approval
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Digital execution
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Contract Management
|Contract management
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Metadata extraction
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Obligation management
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Tracking
|Onboarding process management
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|
|Legal term benchmarking
|
|
|
|
|
|}
With gratitude to {{author|Alex Hamilton}} for setting this out in his excellent book {{br|Sign Here}}, here is a ''functional'' breakdown of the [[contract tech]] landscape — as Alex points out, any of these functions are captured by more than one tool — itself a commercial problem for Vendors, becasue no-one likes to buy duplications:

Revision as of 09:24, 4 October 2021

Phase Function Description Management appreciation factor Lawyer acceptance factor Glamour factor Iatrogenic factor
Phase of contract process What does the bit of kit do? Explain? How excited will management be about this? What is lawyer acceptance factor: the realistic chance that legal eagles will wholeheartedly embrace this tool? How clever, complicated or unique is this as a piece of technology? How far might this tool inadvertently entrench current rent-seeking behaviour?
Initiation Law firm bid management An auction portal for seeking competitive bids on external legal advisory projects High: delivers control, visibility, metrics and cost pressure on external counsel Low: While no work to implement for lawyers, it removes autonomy, power to choose counsel, is unpopular with outside counsel as any bidding system guarantees more losers than winners. Low: It’s eBay or Uber, isn’t it? High: Asks wrong question, namely: “how to I get the cheapest legal advice” rather than “how to I get the best advice or, for that matter, “do I need legal advice at all”.
Self-service portal A place where Sales can go to get pre-appoved legal forms to send out without vetting High: Speeds things up and pushes away low value work from Legal Medium: anything that pushes NDAs off the desk has to be a good thing. Low: Could be as easy as an intranet page or SharePoint Low: disintermediates unnecessary legal touch.
Initiation and prioritisation tool A system for queueing prospects, getting necessary information and prioritising before starting negotiation High: Good oversight of process, good MIS Medium: Helps initiate drafting provided it is used properly and information accurately provided Low: Doesn’t need much tech. Low: Disintermediates. Provides simple information inputs and disciplines personnel to follow process.
Drafting Template Management Centralised templates database or clause library for approving and warehousing approved forms and boilerplate Medium: Should drive efficiency
Document Automation
Freehand Document Assembly
Negotiation Document mananagement system
Automated contract review AI contract review and markup tools
Manual review assistance Comparison, formatting tools,
Negotiation platforms/portal
Execution Execution Approval
Digital execution
Contract Management Contract management
Metadata extraction
Obligation management
Tracking Onboarding process management
Legal term benchmarking

With gratitude to Alex Hamilton for setting this out in his excellent book Sign Here, here is a functional breakdown of the contract tech landscape — as Alex points out, any of these functions are captured by more than one tool — itself a commercial problem for Vendors, becasue no-one likes to buy duplications: