Inhouse counsel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|people | {{a|people||[[File:Legal eagle.jpg|450px|thumb|center|A [[legal eagle]] yesterday.]]}}{{d|Inhouse counsel|/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/|n|}} | ||
A peculiar breed of [[flannelwright]] whose chief expertise resides in: | |||
:(i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but [[Disclaimer|disclaiming]] enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and | :(i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but [[Disclaimer|disclaiming]] enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and | ||
:(ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it. | :(ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it. |
Revision as of 10:49, 12 October 2021
People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.
|
Inhouse counsel
/ˈɪnhaʊs ˈkaʊns(ə)l/ (n.)
A peculiar breed of flannelwright whose chief expertise resides in:
- (i) knowing enough about the law to frame a sensible question about it for someone else, but disclaiming enough knowledge to competently answer the question by herself; and
- (ii) having the tactical acumen to throw just such a hospital pass without anyone twigging that she has done it.
You can find detailed criteria — what it takes to excel at the job of steering emails — here.
The person who proves best at this behaviour over a sustained period of time gets to be general counsel.