Unsubstantiated: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
*[[Truth]]
*[[Truth]]
*[[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]]
*[[Rumsfeld’s taxonomy]]
{{ref}}

Revision as of 13:02, 21 February 2022

The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™
Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Unsubstantiated
/ʌnsəbˈstanʃɪeɪtɪd/ (adj.)

A bullshit artist’s tell. Something inconvenient or embarrassing that happened, but for which there is currently no proof or credible supporting or evidence.

To be contrasted something that did not happen, which may comfortably described as “false”.[1]

Thus, it is easy enough to disarm, by asking, “but is it untrue?”

“Substantiation” is thus a second-order property of a fact: something that, in the eyes of the outside world, falls, in Rumsfeld’s taxonomy, between a “known known” and an “unknown known” — call it a “suspected known” —but to the person making the statement, is squarely in the latter category.

See also

References

  1. We owe this observation to, among others, David Allen Green.