Unsubstantiated: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{g}}{{d|Unsubstantiated|/ʌnsəbˈstanʃɪeɪtɪd/|adj|}} | {{a|g|{{unknowns}}}}{{d|Unsubstantiated|/ʌnsəbˈstanʃɪeɪtɪd/|adj|}} | ||
A bullshit artist’s tell. Something inconvenient or embarrassing that happened, but for which there is currently no proof or credible supporting or evidence. | A bullshit artist’s tell. Something inconvenient or embarrassing that happened, but for which there is currently no proof or credible supporting or evidence. |
Revision as of 13:03, 21 February 2022
There are six types of known. The Rumsfeld three:
And the Jolly Contrarian three:
|
Unsubstantiated
/ʌnsəbˈstanʃɪeɪtɪd/ (adj.)
A bullshit artist’s tell. Something inconvenient or embarrassing that happened, but for which there is currently no proof or credible supporting or evidence.
To be contrasted something that did not happen, which may comfortably described as “false”.[1]
Thus, it is easy enough to disarm, by asking, “but is it untrue?”
“Substantiation” is thus a second-order property of a fact: something that, in the eyes of the outside world, falls, in Rumsfeld’s taxonomy, between a “known known” and an “unknown known” — call it a “suspected known” —but to the person making the statement, is squarely in the latter category.
See also
References
- ↑ We owe this observation to, among others, David Allen Green.