Of counsel: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Bob Cunis]]
*[[Partner]]
*[[Partner]]
*[[General counsel]]
*[[General counsel]]
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Revision as of 16:48, 23 February 2022

Office anthropology™
The JC puts on his pith-helmet, grabs his butterfly net and a rucksack full of marmalade sandwiches, and heads into the concrete jungleIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Of counsel
/ɒv/ /ˈkaʊns(ə)l/ (adj.)

The Bob Cunis of the law firm: neither one thing — an associate — nor the other — a partner. Someone with the chops and general ninjery to be a partner, that the partnership cannot for some reason bring themselves to share their lollies with.

Of counsel”.

Now it is, of course, part of the American lawmakers’ sacred oath to perplex, befuddle and stretch the laiety’s credulity to breaking point: this we know. So we should not be surprised to find that the American Bar Association has a formal opinion on the subject of what you call people you can’t quite make up your mind how to feel about[1], nor that it is much too dreary to recount in any detail here.[2]

For us, the most pressing question is why. Why “of” counsel? Perhaps this prepositional curiosity springs from the same well. Perhaps it speaks to a fundamental essence: in the same way that you might be “of fire”, or she “of water”, I am of counsel. Look, I’m reaching here.

See also

References

  1. Number 90-357, of 10 May 1990 of the ABA’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, since I know you were about to ask.
  2. Click here if you really must.