Otto’s razor: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|work|}}{{quote| | {{a|work|}}{{quote| | ||
'’Tis not malice, spite, nor virtue <br>Whose ledger swells, or plucks, the seedy fruits of progress — <br> | HERCULIO: ''’Tis not malice, spite, nor virtue <br> | ||
But mainly accident. <br> | :Whose ledger swells, or plucks, the seedy fruits of progress — <br> | ||
Lest thy with surety know —<br> | :But mainly accident. <br> | ||
Withhold thy assignations. | :Lest thy with surety know aught else —<br> | ||
:Withhold thy assignations. | |||
TRIAGO: Dost thou mean to say <br> | |||
:Things peel this way<br> | |||
:Through doughty misadventure? | |||
HERCULIO: Peradventure — | |||
TRIAGO: Wouldst though ’pon this shaky surmise | |||
:Withhold thy rebuke? | |||
:Is it no more than that? | |||
HERCULIO: Aye — or a fluke. | |||
:—{{buchstein}}, {{dsh}}}} | :—{{buchstein}}, {{dsh}}}} | ||
A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright {{buchstein}}, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the | A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright {{buchstein}}, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the simplest-minded, preferring cloth-headedness or coincidence over an alternative account involving the artful application of intelligence, inspiration, “malice, spite, or virtue”. | ||
Until the contrary is proven, we should treat both the pinnacles of cultural achievement and the chasms of mortal calumny the product of accident and not design. | |||
{{dsh}} was a comic farce, but (until the dengue fever got him) Büchstein was fond of pointing out apparent monuments to human triumph and stains of monstrous wickedness that in fact came about by more or less fortunate adjacency, and not intelligent design. | |||
{{Sa}} | {{Sa}} | ||
*[[Occam’s razor]] | *[[Occam’s razor]] | ||
*{{buchstein}} | *{{buchstein}} |
Revision as of 16:45, 23 March 2022
Office anthropology™
|
HERCULIO: ’Tis not malice, spite, nor virtue
- Whose ledger swells, or plucks, the seedy fruits of progress —
- But mainly accident.
- Lest thy with surety know aught else —
- Withhold thy assignations.
TRIAGO: Dost thou mean to say
- Things peel this way
- Through doughty misadventure?
HERCULIO: Peradventure — TRIAGO: Wouldst though ’pon this shaky surmise
- Withhold thy rebuke?
- Is it no more than that?
HERCULIO: Aye — or a fluke.
A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright Büchstein, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the simplest-minded, preferring cloth-headedness or coincidence over an alternative account involving the artful application of intelligence, inspiration, “malice, spite, or virtue”.
Until the contrary is proven, we should treat both the pinnacles of cultural achievement and the chasms of mortal calumny the product of accident and not design.
Die Schweizer Heulsuse was a comic farce, but (until the dengue fever got him) Büchstein was fond of pointing out apparent monuments to human triumph and stains of monstrous wickedness that in fact came about by more or less fortunate adjacency, and not intelligent design.