Otto’s razor: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
:—{{buchstein}}, {{dsh}}}}
:—{{buchstein}}, {{dsh}}}}


A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright {{buchstein}}, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the simplest-minded, preferring cloth-headedness or coincidence over an alternative account involving the artful application of intelligence, inspiration, “malice, spite, or virtue”.
A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright {{buchstein}}, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the simplest-minded, preferring cloth-headedness or coincidence over the artful application of intelligence, inspiration, “malice, spite, or virtue”.


Until the contrary is proven, we should treat both the pinnacles of cultural achievement and the chasms of mortal calumny the product of accident and not design.
Until the contrary is proven, we should treat both the pinnacles of cultural achievement and the chasms of mortal calumny the product of accident and not design. Give people the benefit of the doubt, in other words, that their hurtful deeds were careless, unless you have positive grounds to believe they are devious. On the other hand, the spontaneous thoughtful gesture, that stroke of sudden genius, was just as likely ill-thought out.


{{dsh}} was a comic farce, but (until the dengue fever got him) Büchstein was fond of pointing out apparent monuments to human triumph and stains of monstrous wickedness that in fact came about by more or less fortunate adjacency, and not intelligent design.  
{{dsh}} was a comic farce, but (until the dengue fever got him) [[Büchstein]] took the aphorism seriously, was fond of pointing out apparent monuments to human triumph and stains of monstrous wickedness that in fact came about by more or less fortunate adjacency, and not intelligent design.  By the time the “razor” caught on, [[Büchstein]] was deep in a Papaya-juice inflected hallucinations from which he did not recover. This is just as well as assuming the pithiness of Buchstein’s text to be accidental, Robert J Hanlon rebadged (and, frankly, improved) it to read “do not attribute malice to things that can just as well be explained by stupidity.” and that is how it has remained to this day.


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Occam’s razor]]
*[[Occam’s razor]]
*{{buchstein}}
*{{buchstein}}

Revision as of 17:06, 23 March 2022

Office anthropology™
The JC puts on his pith-helmet, grabs his butterfly net and a rucksack full of marmalade sandwiches, and heads into the concrete jungleIndex: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

HERCULIO: ’Tis neither malice, spite, nor virtue
Whose ledger swells, or plucks, the seedy fruits of progress —
But mainly accident.
Lest thy with surety know aught else —
Withhold thy assignations.
TRIAGO: Pish upon thee, nuncle. Pish!
Dost thou mean to say
Things peel this way
Through doughty misadventure?
HERCULIO: Peradventure —
TRIAGO: Pish abeam!
Wouldst thou ’pon this shaky surmise
Withhold thy rebuke? Has thou
No more to say than that?
HERCULIO: ’Tis but a fluke.

Büchstein, Die Schweizer Heulsuse

A rule of thumb, attributed to 19th century Austrian plowright Büchstein, that recommends when there are plausible alternative explanations for a given piece of behaviour, one should choose the simplest-minded, preferring cloth-headedness or coincidence over the artful application of intelligence, inspiration, “malice, spite, or virtue”.

Until the contrary is proven, we should treat both the pinnacles of cultural achievement and the chasms of mortal calumny the product of accident and not design. Give people the benefit of the doubt, in other words, that their hurtful deeds were careless, unless you have positive grounds to believe they are devious. On the other hand, the spontaneous thoughtful gesture, that stroke of sudden genius, was just as likely ill-thought out.

Die Schweizer Heulsuse was a comic farce, but (until the dengue fever got him) Büchstein took the aphorism seriously, was fond of pointing out apparent monuments to human triumph and stains of monstrous wickedness that in fact came about by more or less fortunate adjacency, and not intelligent design. By the time the “razor” caught on, Büchstein was deep in a Papaya-juice inflected hallucinations from which he did not recover. This is just as well as assuming the pithiness of Buchstein’s text to be accidental, Robert J Hanlon rebadged (and, frankly, improved) it to read “do not attribute malice to things that can just as well be explained by stupidity.” and that is how it has remained to this day.

See also