Template:Differences between repo and sell buyback: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Documented [[sell/buy-back]]s''': There are operational differences between repos and documented sell backs:
*'''Documented [[sell/buy-back]]s''': There are operational differences between repos and documented sell backs:
**Differences in the [[margin]]ing process  
**Differences in the [[margin]]ing process  
**What happens when {{gmraprov|income}} is paid on {{gmraprov|collateral}}.
**What happens to {{gmraprov|Income Payments}} on {{gmraprov|Purchased Securities}}. In a {{nutshell}}, under a Repurchase Transaction you “[[manufacture]]” income back to the {{gmraprov|Seller}} during the life of the {{gmraprov|Transaction}}, but do not account separately for {{gmraprov|Accrued Interest}} (it will be factored into the market price of the securities for margining purposes); in a Buy/Sell Back transaction the Buyer doesn’t manufacture {{gmraprov|Income Payments}} back to the {{gmraprov|Seller}}, but does account for {{gmraprov|Accrued Interest}}.


====The Jolly Contrarian’s explanation====
====The JC’s explanation====
Unless you have a taste for {{tag|paradox}} (and who, in our shadow-flecked modern world doesn’t?) there’s ''no'' difference between a [[repo]] and a [[sell/buy-back]], and even seasoned industry professionals get fidgety and make their excuses to pop off to the bathroom if you ask them to give one. To the sentiment that [[buy/sell-back]]s are undocumented, the lie is somewhat given to that by the fact that the {{gmra}} expressly incoporates the {{gmraprov|Buy/Sell Back Transaction}} as a defined term ''with its own freaking Annex'', meticulously negotiated into the master by [[negotiator]]s the world over.
Unless you have a taste for {{tag|paradox}} (and who, in our shadow-flecked modern world doesn’t?) there’s ''no'' difference between a [[repo]] and a [[sell/buy-back]], and even seasoned industry professionals get fidgety and make their excuses to pop off to the bathroom if you ask them to give one. To the sentiment that [[buy/sell-back]]s are undocumented, the lie is somewhat given to that by the fact that the {{gmra}} expressly incoporates the {{gmraprov|Buy/Sell Back Transaction}} as a defined term ''with its own freaking Annex'', meticulously negotiated into the master by [[negotiator]]s the world over.

Revision as of 10:41, 1 June 2022

Difference between Repurchase Transaction and a Buy/Sell Back Transaction

The official explanation

According to ICMA’s helpful website[1] economically, repos and sell/buy-backs both behave like secured loans; legally both amount to a sale and later repurchase of securities. A repurchase agreement is always a written contract; a sell/buy-back need not be.

  • Undocumented sell/buy-backs: The sale and repurchase legs of an undocumented sell/buy-back are considered as separate contracts. Since there is no contract between times:
    • The parties cannot call margin on each other for market movements between the transactions
    • Netting is less certain.

The JC’s explanation

Unless you have a taste for paradox (and who, in our shadow-flecked modern world doesn’t?) there’s no difference between a repo and a sell/buy-back, and even seasoned industry professionals get fidgety and make their excuses to pop off to the bathroom if you ask them to give one. To the sentiment that buy/sell-backs are undocumented, the lie is somewhat given to that by the fact that the Global Master Repurchase Agreement expressly incoporates the Buy/Sell Back Transaction as a defined term with its own freaking Annex, meticulously negotiated into the master by negotiators the world over.