Template:Thirteenth law of worker entropy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [[JC]]’s ''' [[thirteenth law of worker entropy]]''', also known as the [[optical complication theorem]], states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication ''(c)'' which is a function of | The [[JC]]’s ''' [[thirteenth law of worker entropy]]''', also known as the [[optical complication theorem]], states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication ''(c)'' which is a function of | ||
:(i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value (v) of contracts using that template, | :(i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value ''(v)'' of contracts using that template, | ||
:(ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it ''(t)'', and | :(ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it ''(t)'', and | ||
:(iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer ''(r)''. | :(iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer ''(r)''. | ||
The relationship between ''c'', ''v'', ''t'' and ''r'' is as follows: ''c ↔ v = tr.'' <br> | The relationship between ''c'', ''v'', ''t'' and ''r'' is as follows: ''c ↔ v = tr.'' <br> | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 22 June 2022
The JC’s thirteenth law of worker entropy, also known as the optical complication theorem, states that over time, a given legal template will tend to a point of optimal complication (c) which is a function of
- (i) the highest plausibly chargeable fraction of the typical value (v) of contracts using that template,
- (ii) the time required to manipulate the template so it reliably works to the satisfaction of a lawyer having the patience, skill and hubris to understand it (t), and
- (iii) the charge-out rate that lawyer (r).
The relationship between c, v, t and r is as follows: c ↔ v = tr.