Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA Non-affected Party: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Non-Affected Party - ISDA Provision|A]] clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that {{icds}} saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} or the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}, as the case may be”, but that’s just me.
[[Non-Affected Party - ISDA Provision|A]] clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that {{icds}} saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the {{isdaprov|Non-affected Party}} or the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}, as the case may be” — you know, like “{{isdaprov|Innocent Party}}”, or something like that — but perhaps that’s just me.

Latest revision as of 09:58, 7 July 2022

A clause so joyously well-crafted in 1992, that ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ saw no need to change it a decade later, when the opportunity presented itself. They might have grasped it to devise a concept less clumsy than “the Non-affected Party or the Non-defaulting Party, as the case may be” — you know, like “Innocent Party”, or something like that — but perhaps that’s just me.