Template:M summ EUA Annex EEP: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:4. During the three-year period beginning 1 January 2005, Member States shall apply a lower [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] of EUR 40 for each tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emitted by that installation for which the operator has not surrendered allowances. Payment of the [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] shall not release the operator from the obligation to surrender an amount of allowances equal to those excess emissions when surrendering allowances in relation to the following calendar year.}} | :4. During the three-year period beginning 1 January 2005, Member States shall apply a lower [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] of EUR 40 for each tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emitted by that installation for which the operator has not surrendered allowances. Payment of the [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] shall not release the operator from the obligation to surrender an amount of allowances equal to those excess emissions when surrendering allowances in relation to the following calendar year.}} | ||
Note: the [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] falls on those operators who actually emit carbon dioxide. To the extent you are a financial, and your business is in the trading, liquidity and market making of [[EUA]]s themselves, and not offsetting real-world carbon emissions they are designed to control, then {{euaprov|EEP}}s are not likely to come high up your list of priorities. That being said, there ''is'' an indirect implication for financial-only counterparties if they [[Failure to Deliver - Emissions Annex Provision|fail to deliver]] to operators in time so operators can surrender to the authorities by the {{euaprov|Reconciliation Deadline}}, since the former’s settlement failure brings a real world penalty charge on the later. Therefore you may wish to consider the otherwise rather perplexing {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}} language in the {{euaprov|Annex}} dealing with that contingency. | Note: the [[Excess Emissions Penalty - Emissions Annex Provision|excess emissions penalty]] falls on those operators who actually emit carbon dioxide. To the extent you are a financial, and your business is in the trading, liquidity and market making of [[EUA]]s themselves, and not offsetting real-world carbon emissions they are designed to control, then {{euaprov|EEP}}s are not likely to come high up your list of priorities. That being said, there ''is'' an indirect implication for financial-only counterparties if they [[Failure to Deliver - Emissions Annex Provision|fail to deliver]] to operators in time so operators can surrender to the authorities by the {{euaprov|Reconciliation Deadline}}, since the former’s settlement failure brings a real world penalty charge on the later. Therefore you may wish to consider the otherwise rather perplexing {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}} language in the {{euaprov|Annex}} dealing with that contingency. | ||
{{subtableflexpad|Hey titty bum bum}} | {{subtableflexpad|49|1|Hey titty bum bum}} |
Revision as of 14:30, 20 July 2022
The Excess Emissions Penalty is made flesh in Article 16 of the EU ETS directive.
Article 16: Penalties
|
Note: the excess emissions penalty falls on those operators who actually emit carbon dioxide. To the extent you are a financial, and your business is in the trading, liquidity and market making of EUAs themselves, and not offsetting real-world carbon emissions they are designed to control, then EEPs are not likely to come high up your list of priorities. That being said, there is an indirect implication for financial-only counterparties if they fail to deliver to operators in time so operators can surrender to the authorities by the Reconciliation Deadline, since the former’s settlement failure brings a real world penalty charge on the later. Therefore you may wish to consider the otherwise rather perplexing Failure to Deliver language in the Annex dealing with that contingency.
Hey titty bum bum |
- ↑ In ISDA Emissions Annex speak, the “Reconciliation Deadline”.