It is not in my nature: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:—''[[Silence of the Lambs]]''}} | :—''[[Silence of the Lambs]]''}} | ||
Now, let us imagine the same scene, in the legal operations team. | |||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Innovation]] | |||
*[[Frog and the scorpion]] | *[[Frog and the scorpion]] | ||
*[[Innovation]] | *[[Innovation]] |
Revision as of 09:17, 18 October 2022
The design of organisations and products
|
A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across the river. The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung.
“But,” says the scorpion, “if I sting you, we will both drown”.
“I see!” says the frog. “Hop on!”
They wade into the river. Midway across, the scorpion stings the frog.
With his dying breath, the frog cries, “Why did you do that? Now we both will die!”
The scorpion shrugs. “It’s in my nature.”
A sense check one should always run before proposing a sensible, rational and logical change to a well-established process.
Rational, logical and sensible processes are not always the prime motivating force when you deal with another human. Especially a legal eagle. What is his nature?
Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?
Clarice: He kills women —
Lecter: No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?
Clarice: Anger — social acceptance — and — sexual frustrations, sir —
Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet?
Now, let us imagine the same scene, in the legal operations team.